Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8845753›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society1996

Structure of a secreted aspartic protease from C. albicans complexed with a potent inhibitor: implications for the design of antifungal agents.

C Abad-Zapatero, R Goldman, S W Muchmore, C Hutchins, K Stewart, J Navaza, C D Payne, T L Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Secreted Aspartic Proteinases: Key Factors inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Aspartic peptidase ofJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases in virulence and pathogenesis.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2003
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C Abad-ZapateroLaboratory of Protein Crystallography, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-3500, USA.
R Goldman
S W Muchmore
C Hutchins
K Stewart
J Navaza
C D Payne
T L Ray

Funding

ROLE OF CANDIDA ACID PROTEINASE IN PATHOGENESISR01AI024344 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI RAY, THOMAS L · 1988 to 1995
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI24344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The three-dimensional structure of a secreted aspartic protease from Candida albicans complexed with a potent inhibitor reveals variations on the classical aspartic protease theme that dramatically alter the specificity of this class of enzymes. The structure presents: (1) an 8-residue insertion near the first disulfide (Cys 45-Cys 50, pepsin numbering) that results in a broad flap extending toward the active site; (2) a 7-residue deletion replacing helix hN2 (Ser 110-Tyr 114), which enlarges the S3 pocket; (3) a short polar connection between the two rigid body domains that alters their relative orientation and provides certain specificity; and (4) an ordered 11-residue addition at the carboxy terminus. The inhibitor binds in an extended conformation and presents a branched structure at the P3 position. The implications of these findings for the design of potent antifungal agents are discussed.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAmino Acid SequenceAntifungal AgentsAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesBinding SitesCandida albicansCrystallography, X-RayMolecular Sequence DataProtease InhibitorsProtein ConformationAntifungal AgentsAspartic Acid EndopeptidasesProtease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID8845753
PMCPMC2143388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.