Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8844158›Full record

ArticleGenetics1996

Length variation of CAG/CAA trinucleotide repeats in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and its relation to the recombination rate.

Y Michalakis, M Veuille

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mutational dynamics of microsatellites.Molecular biotechnology · 2010
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Y MichalakisLaboratoire d'Ecologie, Université Pierre-et-Marie Curie, Paris, France.
M Veuille

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eleven genes distributed along the Drosophila melanogaster chromosome 2 and showing exonic tandem repeats of glutamine codons (CAG or CAA) were surveyed for length variation in a sample of four European and African populations. Only one gene was monomorphic. Eight genes were polymorphic in all populations, with a total number of alleles varying between five and 12 for 120 chromosomes. The average heterozygozity per locus and population was 0.41. Selective neutrality in length variation could not be rejected under the assumptions of the infinite allele model. Significant population subdivision was found though no geographical pattern emerged, all populations being equally different. Significant linkage disequilibrium was found in four out of seven cases where the genetic distance between loci was < 1 cM and was negligible when the distance was larger. There is evidence that these associations were established after the populations separated. An unexpected result was that variation at each locus was independent of the coefficient of exchange, although the latter ranged from zero to the relatively high value of 6.7%. This would indicate that background selection and selective hitchhiking, which are thought to affect levels of nucleotide substitution polymorphism, have no effect on trinucleotide repeat variation.

Indexed as

Minisatellite RepeatsRecombination, GeneticTrinucleotide RepeatsAllelesAnimalsBase SequenceDNA PrimersDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenes, InsectGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationLinkage DisequilibriumMaleModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID8844158
PMCPMC1207433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.