Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8842421›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996

Effects of nitric oxide (NO) and NO donors on the membrane conductance of circular smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig proximal colon.

M J Watson, R A Bywater, G S Taylor, R J Lang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J WatsonDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
R A Bywater
G S Taylor
R J Lang
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The membrane conductance changes underlying the membrane hyperpolarizations induced by nitric oxide (NO), S-nitroso-L-cysteine (NC) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were investigated in the circular smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig proximal colon, by use of standard intracellular microelectrode recording techniques. 2. NO (1%), NC (2.5-25 microM) and SNP (1-1000 microM) induced membrane hyperpolarization in a concentration-dependent manner, the hyperpolarizations to NO and NC developing more rapidly than those to SNP. The slower-developing responses to SNP were mimicked by the membrane permeable analogue of guanosine 3':5' cyclic-monophosphate (cyclic GMP), 8-bromo-cyclic GMP (500 microM), and by isoprenaline (10 microM). 3. The hyperpolarizations to NC and SNP were reduced in a low Ca2+ (0.25 mM) saline and upon the addition of haemoglobin (20 microM), but were not effected by NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG) (100 microM) or omega-conotoxin GVIA (100 nM). the hyperpolarizations to SNP were also significantly reduced by methylene blue (50 microM). 4. Apamin (250 nM) depolarized the membrane potential approximately 10 mV and reduced the initial transient component of the hyperpolarization to NO (1%) and NC (25 microM), but had no effects on the hyperpolarizations to SNP and cyclic GMP. Tetraethylammonium (TEA) (5-15 mM), had little effect on the membrane responses to NO(1%), NC(2.5-25 microM), SNP(100(-1000) microM) or cyclic GMP(500 microM). However, TEA (5-15 mM) reduced the membrane hyperpolarizations to SNP (10 microM) and isoprenaline (10 microM) in a concentration-dependent manner. The hyperpolarization to isoprenaline (10 microM) remaining in the presence of 15 mM TEA was blocked by ouabain (10 microM). 5. The amplitude of electronic potentials (1 s duration) elicited during NO donor hyperpolarizations were little changed or only slightly reduced (5-25%). However, the amplitude of the electrotonic potentials elicited during maintained electrically-induced hyperpolarizations of similar amplitude were significantly increased (30-150%), suggesting that the non-linear membrane properties of the proximal colon partially mask an increase in membrane conductance elicited during the NO donor hyperpolarizations. 6. Membrane hyperpolarization in the presence of an NO donor, 8-bromo-cyclic GMP, isoprenaline, or upon application of a maintained hyperpolarizing electrical current, often evoked oscillations of the membrane potential. These oscillations were prevented by Cs+ (1 mM). 7. These results indicate that NO and NC hyperpolarize the circular muscle of the proximal colon by activating at least two TEA-resistant membrane K+ conductances, one of which is sensitive to apamin blockade. The K+ conductance increases activated by SNP or 8-bromo-cyclic GMP were little effected by apamin, perhaps suggesting a common mechanism. In contrast, the hyperpolarization to isoprenaline appears to involve the activation of TEA-sensitive Ca2(+)-activated K+ ('BK') channels, as well as a Na:K ATPase. Finally, the 'background' membrane conductance of the circular muscle cells of the proximal colon decreased upon membrane hyperpolarization to reveal oscillations of the membrane potential which may well represent 'pacemaker' or 'slow wave' activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumCell Membrane PermeabilityColonCyclic GMPEnzyme InhibitorsGuanylate CyclaseGuinea PigsHemoglobinsIn Vitro TechniquesMagnesiumMembrane PotentialsMuscle, SmoothNitric OxideNitric Oxide SynthaseNitroarginine8-bromocyclic GMPCalciumCyclic GMPEnzyme InhibitorsGuanylate CyclaseHemoglobinsMagnesiumNitric OxideNitric Oxide SynthaseNitroarginineNitroprussidePenicillaminePotassium ChannelsS-Nitroso-N-AcetylpenicillamineVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID8842421
PMCPMC1909820
OpenAlexW2037662881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.