ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
Effects of nitric oxide (NO) and NO donors on the membrane conductance of circular smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig proximal colon.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Purinergic neuromuscular transmission is selectively attenuated in ulcerated regions of inflamed guinea pig distal colon.The Journal of physiology · 2010Article
- Gastric motility in soluble guanylate cyclase alpha 1 knock-out mice.The Journal of physiology · 2007Article
- Noradrenaline inhibits pacemaker currents through stimulation of beta 1-adrenoceptors in cultured interstitial cells of Cajal from murine small intestine.British journal of pharmacology · 2004Article
- Cyclic GMP-associated apamin-sensitive nitrergic slow inhibitory junction potential in the hamster ileum.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
- Nitric oxide decreases the excitability of interstitial cells of Cajal through activation of the BK channel.Journal of cellular and molecular medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The membrane conductance changes underlying the membrane hyperpolarizations induced by nitric oxide (NO), S-nitroso-L-cysteine (NC) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were investigated in the circular smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig proximal colon, by use of standard intracellular microelectrode recording techniques. 2. NO (1%), NC (2.5-25 microM) and SNP (1-1000 microM) induced membrane hyperpolarization in a concentration-dependent manner, the hyperpolarizations to NO and NC developing more rapidly than those to SNP. The slower-developing responses to SNP were mimicked by the membrane permeable analogue of guanosine 3':5' cyclic-monophosphate (cyclic GMP), 8-bromo-cyclic GMP (500 microM), and by isoprenaline (10 microM). 3. The hyperpolarizations to NC and SNP were reduced in a low Ca2+ (0.25 mM) saline and upon the addition of haemoglobin (20 microM), but were not effected by NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG) (100 microM) or omega-conotoxin GVIA (100 nM). the hyperpolarizations to SNP were also significantly reduced by methylene blue (50 microM). 4. Apamin (250 nM) depolarized the membrane potential approximately 10 mV and reduced the initial transient component of the hyperpolarization to NO (1%) and NC (25 microM), but had no effects on the hyperpolarizations to SNP and cyclic GMP. Tetraethylammonium (TEA) (5-15 mM), had little effect on the membrane responses to NO(1%), NC(2.5-25 microM), SNP(100(-1000) microM) or cyclic GMP(500 microM). However, TEA (5-15 mM) reduced the membrane hyperpolarizations to SNP (10 microM) and isoprenaline (10 microM) in a concentration-dependent manner. The hyperpolarization to isoprenaline (10 microM) remaining in the presence of 15 mM TEA was blocked by ouabain (10 microM). 5. The amplitude of electronic potentials (1 s duration) elicited during NO donor hyperpolarizations were little changed or only slightly reduced (5-25%). However, the amplitude of the electrotonic potentials elicited during maintained electrically-induced hyperpolarizations of similar amplitude were significantly increased (30-150%), suggesting that the non-linear membrane properties of the proximal colon partially mask an increase in membrane conductance elicited during the NO donor hyperpolarizations. 6. Membrane hyperpolarization in the presence of an NO donor, 8-bromo-cyclic GMP, isoprenaline, or upon application of a maintained hyperpolarizing electrical current, often evoked oscillations of the membrane potential. These oscillations were prevented by Cs+ (1 mM). 7. These results indicate that NO and NC hyperpolarize the circular muscle of the proximal colon by activating at least two TEA-resistant membrane K+ conductances, one of which is sensitive to apamin blockade. The K+ conductance increases activated by SNP or 8-bromo-cyclic GMP were little effected by apamin, perhaps suggesting a common mechanism. In contrast, the hyperpolarization to isoprenaline appears to involve the activation of TEA-sensitive Ca2(+)-activated K+ ('BK') channels, as well as a Na:K ATPase. Finally, the 'background' membrane conductance of the circular muscle cells of the proximal colon decreased upon membrane hyperpolarization to reveal oscillations of the membrane potential which may well represent 'pacemaker' or 'slow wave' activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.