ArticleUrological research1995
Effects of nerve stimulation on the spontaneous action potentials recorded in the proximal renal pelvis of the guinea-pig.
Article in Urological research, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous electrical and Ca2+ signals in typical and atypical smooth muscle cells and interstitial cell of Cajal-like cells of mouse renal pelvis.The Journal of physiology · 2007Article
- Pyeloureteric peristalsis: role of atypical smooth muscle cells and interstitial cells of Cajal-like cells as pacemakers.The Journal of physiology · 2006Review
- Modulators of internal Ca2+ stores and the spontaneous electrical and contractile activity of the guinea-pig renal pelvis.British journal of pharmacology · 2002Article
- Identification of the cells underlying pacemaker activity in the guinea-pig upper urinary tract.The Journal of physiology · 1999Article
- Interstitial cell of Cajal-like cells in the upper urinary tract.Journal of cellular and molecular medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of nerve stimulation on the electrical and mechanical activity of the smooth muscle of the proximal renal pelvis of the guinea-pig were investigated using standard tension and microelectrode recording techniques. Spontaneous action potentials were deemed to have been recorded from three cell types: (1) "pacemaker" cells (9 of > 120) had membrane potentials (MPs) of -42.1 +/- 2.9 mV and fired action potentials of a simple waveform; (2) "driven" cells (> 100) had more stable MPs of -56.1 +/- 1.2 mV (n = 36) and more complex "ureter-like" action potentials; (3) the remaining cells had MPs of -45.5 +/- 1.7 mV (n = 15) and action potentials with a waveform "intermediate" to groups (1) and (2). Nifedipine (0.1-1 microM) and Cd2+ (0.1-1 mM) blocked all spontaneous action potential discharge and depolarized the membrane to near -40 mV. Intramural nerve stimulation (10-50 Hz for 1-10 s) increased both the amplitude and frequency of the spontaneous contractile activity, this increase peaked in about 30 s and decayed slowly over several minutes. Nerve stimulation depolarized pacemaker and driven cells 9.1 +/- 3.5 (n = 3) and 1.6 +/- 0.7 (n = 6) mV, respectively; the frequency of their action potential discharge increased from 7.6 +/- 2.7 and 9.9 +/- 1.1/min to 17.3 +/- 0.5 and 11.1 +/- 1.4/min, respectively. The duration of the action potentials in driven cells also increased significantly for several minutes. All these effects were blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX) (1.6 microM). It was concluded that the positive chronotropic and inotropic effects of nerve stimulation on renal pelvis contractility can be correlated with the changes in the frequency and duration of the action potentials recorded in driven cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.