Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8837547›Full record

ReviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne1996

Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 9. Calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis.

K Siminoski, R G Josse

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Calcitonin for treating acute and chronic pain of recent and remote osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Calcitonin for treating acute pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2005
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Osteoporosis prevention, screening, and treatment: a review.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Drug reimbursement: indicators of inappropriate resource allocation.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2002
    Article
  7. Managing acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures with calcitonin.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 1998
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K SiminoskiDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
R G Josse
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe potential therapeutic uses of calcitonin in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. OPTIONS: Parenterally and intranasally administered calcitonin (eel, salmon or human). OUTCOMES: Fracture, fracture pain and loss of bone mineral density in osteoporosis; increased bone mass, prevention of fractures, reduction of pain and improved quality of life associated with calcitonin treatment. EVIDENCE: Relevant clinical studies and reports were examined, with an emphasis on recent randomized, placebo-controlled trials. In vitro and in vivo studies of osteoclast activity were also considered. VALUES: Reducing fractures and fracture pain, increasing bone mineral density and minimizing side effects of treatment were given a high value. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Calcitonin reduces acute pain associated with osteoporotic fractures and has been found useful in treating chronic back pain following vertebral fractures in spinal osteoporosis. It can prevent bone loss and may be effective in preventing fractures. Side effects are dose related and generally mild; they include gastrointestinal, vascular and dermatologic conditions that can be treated symptomatically or by varying the dosage. Side effects are much rarer with nasal administration than with injection. True allergic reactions are rare. RECOMMENDATIONS: Calcitonin in both intramuscular and intranasal forms can reduce the pain of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures and may be effective in treating that associated with chronic vertebral osteoporotic fractures. Calcitonin may also prevent postmenopausal bone loss and increase bone density in those with established osteoporosis. Current evidence for long-term prevention of fractures is limited and does not support the use of calcitonin as a first-line treatment for established osteoporosis. Most side effects can be avoided with nasal administration. Further trials are needed to assess fracture prevention and effective dose ranges for treating pain and increasing bone mineral density and to determine the long-term efficacy of calcitonin in secondary osteoporosis, in premenopausal women, in men and in elderly people.

Indexed as

AgedCalcitoninCanadaFemaleFractures, SpontaneousHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisSocieties, MedicalCalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID8837547
PMCPMC1335462
OpenAlexW1525845107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.