Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8836685›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research1996

Inhibitory action of dopamine involves a subthreshold Cs(+)-sensitive conductance in neostriatal neurons.

M T Pacheco-Cano, J Bargas, S Hernández-López, D Tapia, E Galarraga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The serotonin 5-HTJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dopaminergic modulation of spiny neurons in the turtle striatum.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differential tonic GABA conductances in striatal medium spiny neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Article
  19. Dopaminergic modulation of axon collaterals interconnecting spiny neurons of the rat striatum.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2003
    Article
  20. Brain oscillations, medium spiny neurons, and dopamine.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2002
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M T Pacheco-CanoDepartamento de Neurociencias, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
J Bargas
S Hernández-López
D Tapia
E Galarraga
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracellular recordings in in vitro slice preparations of rat brain were used to compare the actions of dopamine and dopamine receptor agonists on the subthreshold membrane properties of neostriatal neurons. A reproducible response for dopaminergic agonists was evoked after firing produced by current ramp injections that induced a subthreshold voltage displacement. Dopamine (10-100 microM) decreased both firing rate and membrane slope input resistance in virtually all cells tested. Input resistance change appeared as an increase in inward rectification. Approximate reversal potential was around -87 mV. The D1 receptor agonists SKF 38393 and Cl-APB (1-10 microM) mimicked both dopamine effects with a reversal potential around -89 mV. The effects were blocked by the presence of 5-10 mM caesium (Cs+) but not by 1 microM tetrodotoxin, suggesting that main D1 effects on input resistance are due to subthreshold Cs(+)-sensitive conductances. cAMP analogues mimicked the actions of D1 receptor agonists. The D2 agonist, quinpirole (1-10 microM), did not produce any input resistance change, nonetheless, it still produced a decrease in firing rate. This suggests that the main D2 effect on firing is due to actions on suprathreshold ion conductances. All effects were blocked by D1 and D2 antagonists, respectively. D1 or D2 effects were found in the majority of cells tested.

Indexed as

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepineAction PotentialsAnimalsBenzazepinesCesiumCyclic AMPDopamineDopamine AgonistsElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyEvoked PotentialsHaloperidolIn Vitro TechniquesIon ChannelsMembrane PotentialsNeostriatum2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepineBenzazepinesCesiumCyclic AMPDopamineDopamine AgonistsHaloperidolIon ChannelsQuinpiroleReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2SulpirideTetrodotoxin

Identifiers

PMID8836685
OpenAlexW1986461510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.