Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8832901›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports1995

Regulation of Oct-4 gene expression during differentiation of EC cells.

J Schoorlemmer, L Jonk, S Sanbing, A van Puijenbroek, A Feijen, W Kruijer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intricacies of Pluripotency.Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine · 2015
    Article
  7. Regulatory potential of COUP-TFs in development: stem/progenitor cells.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2013
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genome-wide analysis of OCT4 binding sites in glioblastoma cancer cells.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J SchoorlemmerHubrecht Laboratorium, Netherlands Institute for Developmental Biology, The Netherlands.
L Jonk
S Sanbing
A van Puijenbroek
A Feijen
W Kruijer
Hubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stem cell-specific factor Oct-4 is expressed in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells and is quickly down regulated upon RA-induced differentiation. Irrespective of the direction of differentiation, Oct-4 repression in P19 EC cells requires treatment with high doses of either all-trans or 9-cis RA. Unlike in P19 cells, no RA-induced down regulation of Oct-4 expression is observed in the P19-derived RA-resistant RAC65 cells. However, in these cells Oct-4 promoter repression can be rescued in a RA-dependent manner by cotransfection of RAR alpha 2 or RAR beta 2 but not RARr gamma 1, matching previously reported transactivation properties of these receptor types. In the vicinity of the transcription initiation site of the Oct-4 gene, three Hormone Response Element HRE half sites are present which are arranged as direct repeats with different spacing. In vitro translated RAR and RXR proteins bind to this HRE as heterodimers with low affinity, in such a way that all three HRE half sites contribute to complex formation. Although P19 EC cells contain weak binding activity interacting with the Oct-4 promoter HRE, strong binding activity is observed in nuclear extracts from RA-treated P19 cells. This binding activity was shown to correspond to COUP-TFs but not nuclear RA receptors. Moreover, the presence of these binding factors in nuclear extracts corresponds to silencing of Oct-4 expression. These results implicate RA and the action of its nuclear receptors in silencing Oct-4 expression upon differentiation of EC cells. The observed silencing is most likely not exerted by direct binding of RARs to the Oct-4 proximal promoter HRE. Our results support models in which different nuclear receptor complexes sequentially occupy different sites in the Oct-4 promoter HRE to silence Oct-4 expression during RA-induced differentiation.

Indexed as

Transcription FactorsCell DifferentiationCell ExtractsCell NucleusDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEmbryonal Carcinoma Stem CellsGene Expression RegulationHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Promoter Regions, GeneticReceptors, Retinoic AcidRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA, MessengerStem CellsCell ExtractsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanReceptors, Retinoic AcidRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsTretinoin

Identifiers

PMID8832901
OpenAlexW2000479522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.