ArticleBasic research in cardiology
Is preconditioning by nicotine responsible for the better prognosis in smokers with acute myocardial infarction?
Article in Basic research in cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cigarette smoking is a well-known risk factor for acute myocardial infarction and sudden death. However, a history of smoking consistently has been associated with better hospital outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The mechanism for the better outcome in smokers is not clear. It has been suggested that nicotine may have a "preconditioning-like" effect. This study assesses whether nicotine attenuates myocardial infarct size. Anesthetized rabbits were randomized to receive infusion of nicotine 80 micrograms/kg (n = 13), or saline (n = 12) over 10 min. Twenty minutes after termination of infusion all rabbits underwent 30 min of coronary artery occlusion and 4 h of reperfusion. Risk zone was assessed by blue dye and infarct size by tetrazolium staining. Nicotine did not affect regional myocardial blood flow 15 min after treatment, during occlusion or during reperfusion. Heart rate and mean systemic blood pressure were similar between the groups. Nicotine serum levels during occlusion were 9.5-22.0 ng/ml in the treated group, which are comparable to levels found in human smokers. No differences were found in the risk zone of nicotine compared to control rabbits (26 +/- 2% vs. 23 +/- 2% of the left ventricle, respectively), or infarct size (31 +/- 5% vs. 37 +/- 4% of risk zone). Since no effect on infarct size was found, a third group receiving higher dose of nicotine, 320 micrograms/kg (n = 6), was added. Infarct size was not different from the control group (39 +/- 6% of risk zone). Nicotine, given intravenously before ischemic insult, does not protect the myocardium. A "preconditioning-like" effect of nicotine is probably not the mechanism of reduced mortality in smoking patients with myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.