Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8831938›Full record

ReviewBasic research in cardiology

The role of Na+/H+ exchange in ischemia-reperfusion.

H M Piper, C Balser, Y V Ladilov, M Schäfer, B Siegmund, M Ruiz-Meana, D Garcia-Dorado

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Basic research in cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Targeting CaFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2009
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H M PiperPhysiologisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Giessen, FRG.
C Balser
Y V Ladilov
M Schäfer
B Siegmund
M Ruiz-Meana
D Garcia-Dorado
University of Giessen · DEVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In ischemia the cytosol of cardiomyocytes acidifies; this is reversed upon reperfusion. One of the major pH(i)-regulating transport systems involved is the Na+/H+ exchanger. Inhibitors of the Na+/H+ exchanger have been found to more effectively protect ischemic-reperfused myocardium when administered before and during ischemia than during reperfusion alone. It has been hypothesized that the protection provided by pre-ischemic administration is due to a reduction in Na+ and secondary Ca2+ influx. Under reperfusion conditions Na+/H/ exchange inhibition also seems protective since it prolongs intracellular acidosis which can prevent hypercontracture. In detail, however, the mechanisms by which Na+/H+ exchange inhibition provides protection in ischemic-reperfused myocardium are still not fully identified.

Indexed as

AcidosisAnimalsCalciumHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIntracellular FluidMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryReperfusion InjurySodiumSodium-Hydrogen ExchangersCalciumSodiumSodium-Hydrogen Exchangers

Identifiers

PMID8831938
OpenAlexW2085205024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.