ReviewBasic research in cardiology
Na+/H+ exchange in hypertension and in diabetes mellitus--facts and hypotheses.
Review in Basic research in cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An enhancement of Na+/H+ exchange (NHE) in blood cells of selected patients with essential hypertension and with diabetic nephropathy has been described by various investigators. Recent studies have shown that enhanced NHE activity persists in immortalized lymphoblasts from these patients after prolonged cell culture and, thus, appears to be under genetic control. Available evidence strongly argues against a mutation in the encoding gene or an overexpression of the NHE. Immortalized cells from hypertensive patients with enhanced NHE activity display two-fold enhanced agonist-induced rises of the cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration and the underlying reason was identified as an increased activation of pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G proteins. The molecular mechanism(s) of this phenomenon have not yet been elucidated. It appears likely that similar changes contribute to the enhanced NHE activity phenotype in diabetic nephropathy, although experimental evidence for this is still lacking. An enhanced activation of PTX-sensitive G proteins could explain many of the hitherto unexplained phenomena in essential hypertension, e.g. inheritance, increased vasoconstriction, hypertrophy of remodeling of arterial blood vessels and the heart, enhanced platelet aggregation etc. In diabetes the same defect could provide the basis for the susceptibility to nephropathy, e.g. by enhancing the deleterious effects of autocrine and paracrine growth factors. Thus, the experimental approach of immortalizing blood cells from patients with essential hypertension and diabetic nephropathy has opened new horizons in the identification of genetically fixed abnormalities in intracellular signal transduction which could contribute to both pathologies and which can now be studied without the confounding influences of the diabetic or hypertensive in vivo milieu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.