Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8828141›Full record

ReviewVirus genes1995

Evolution and biological significance of human retroelements.

C Leib-Mösch, W Seifarth

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virus genes, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Retroelements and their impact on genome evolution and functioning.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2009
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Leib-MöschIII. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Federal Republic of Germany.
W Seifarth
University Medical Centre Mannheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retroelements comprise a substantial portion of the human genome. Their large number and ubiquitous distribution has led scientists to speculate about their evolutionary origin and their biological functions. Human endogenous retroviruses and their retrotransposon relatives represent a reservoir of possibly pathogenic retroviral genes that may be activated spontaneously or by environmental conditions. They can act as insertion mutagens and activate or inactivate cellular genes, or may be involved in chromosome aberrations by recombination of related elements on different chromosomal locations. Retroviral gene products themselves may also be pathogenic and, for example, could be implicated in the development of tumors and autoimmune diseases. On the other hand, endogenous retroviral elements and nonviral retroposons are thought to have played an important role in shaping the genomes of vertebrates by intracellular transposition events and by generating hot spots of recombination. In the course of time, some of these elements have acquired cellular functions, such as, for instance, in the regulation of gene expression. Therefore, the role of human endogenous retroviruses and retroposons in biological processes is currently a subject of great interest.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularRetroelementsAnimalsHumansPhylogenyRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID8828141
OpenAlexW2038996651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.