Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8825129›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer research and treatment1996

Anti-invasion drugs.

R B Dickson, M D Johnson, M Maemura, J Low

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer research and treatment, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R B DicksonLombardi Cancer Research Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
M D Johnson
M Maemura
J Low

Funding

SPORE IN BREAST CANCERP50CA058185 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DICKSON, ROBERT B. · 1992 to 2004
$4.0M
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTIONU01CA051908 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI WELLSTEIN, ANTON · 1990 to 1994
–
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA58185NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA51908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the pharmaceuticals in clinical practice today for treatment of breast and other cancers are cytotoxic or cytostatic inhibitors of tumor growth. While this type of drug has found its place, along with surgery and radiotherapy, in treatment of disease, the breast cancer death rate has not decreased. This appears to be the result of rising incidence, resistance to therapy, and metastasis of the disease. Since distant metastasis (usually indicated by lymph node involvement) of breast cancer is related only indirectly to tumor size, it would appear that a concerted effort should be made to discover drugs which directly interfere with this complex process. Metastasis appears to depend upon tumor cell motility, dedifferentiation, local invasion, and angiogenesis. Significant progress has been recently made in the creation of new animal models of metastasis and in identifying several new drugs which may be suitable for clinical inhibition of this process. This article reviews current findings on anti-invasion/metastasis drugs with a focus on breast cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeovascularization, PathologicAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID8825129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.