Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8821547›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996

Comparative studies of the angiogenic activity of vasoactive intestinal peptide, endothelins-1 and -3 and angiotensin II in a rat sponge model.

D E Hu, C R Hiley, T P Fan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Erythropoietin and Its Angiogenic Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  2. VIP and growth factors in the infected cornea.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2011
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D E HuDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge.
C R Hiley
T P Fan
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1 The angiogenic activity of four vasoactive peptides with a range of vasodilator and vasoconstrictor properties, i.e. vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), endothelin-1, endothelin-3 and angiotensin II, were investigated in a rat sponge model. Neovascularization was assessed by the 133Xe clearance technique and confirmed by histological studies. 2 Daily doses of the vasodilator peptide, VIP (1000 pmol), caused intense neovascularization, but a lower dose (10 pmol) produced no apparent effect. However, the lower dose of VIP, when given with a subthreshold dose of interleukin-1 alpha (0.3 pmol), produced an angiogenic response similar to that seen with the higher dose of VIP. The neovascular response induced by co-administration of VIP and interleukin-1 alpha was inhibited by simultaneous administration of 100 pmol VIP (10-28), a specific VIP receptor antagonist. 3 In contrast, daily doses of 10, 100 or 1000 pmol endothelin-3 (a mixed vasoconstrictor and vasodilator with more marked vasodilator activity) or of 100 or 1000 pmol endothelin-1 (also with mixed activity but with much more pronounced vasoconstrictor response) produced no apparent effect on sponge-induced angiogenesis. 4 The vasoconstrictor peptide, angiotensin II, in daily doses of 1000 pmol, caused an intense neovascularization like VIP but lower doses of angiotensin II (10 or 100 pmol) produced no apparent effect. The lowest dose of angiotensin II (10 pmol) when administered with the subthreshold dose of interleukin-1 alpha (0.3 pmol) had no effect on the basal neovascular response in the sponges. The angiotensin II-induced neovascular response was inhibited by co-administration of 100 nmol of the specific AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan, but not by the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD 123319. 5 These data show that VIP and angiotensin II possess angiogenic activity. However, endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 had no activity at the doses used. Thus the angiogenic response is not related to local vasoconstriction or vasodilatation in the sponges. The blockade of VIP- and angiotensin II-induced angiogenesis at the receptor level suggests that receptor modulation could provide a strategy for the management of angiogenic diseases.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IAngiotensin IIAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsEndothelinsMaleNeovascularization, PathologicRatsRats, WistarReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal PeptideVasoactive Intestinal PeptideVasoconstrictor AgentsXenon RadioisotopesAngiotensin IAngiotensin IIAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsEndothelinsReceptors, Vasoactive Intestinal PeptideVasoactive Intestinal PeptideVasoconstrictor AgentsXenon Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID8821547
PMCPMC1909324
OpenAlexW2004336582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.