Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8820897›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1996

The use of ratings of perceived exertion for regulating exercise levels in rowing ergometry.

H E Marriott, K L Lamb

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02883309 (Efficacy of an Intradialysis Combined Muscle Strength and Cardiorespiratory Capacity Training Program on Disability Level and Physical Performance, in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure at a Kidney Replacement Therapy Unit.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02883309 approved for marketingnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of an Intradialysis Combined Muscle Strength and Cardiorespiratory Capacity Training Program on Disability Level and Physical Performance, in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure at a Kidney Replacement Therapy Unit.

Typeexpanded_accessSponsorUniversidad Austral de ChileRan2013 to 2014ConditionsChronic Renal FailureArmsintradialytic physical training program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Self-regulation of exercise intensity by estimated time limit scale.European journal of applied physiology · 2012
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Moderators of Perceived Effort in Adolescent Rowers During a Graded Exercise Test.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Monitoring of performance and training in rowing.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H E MarriottDepartment of Physical Education and Sports Science, Chester College of Higher Education, England.
K L Lamb

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the use of ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) to estimate and regulate exercise intensity during rowing ergometry. Nine competitive male rowers [mean age 28.6 years, (SD 6.3)] completed two rowing trials on an ergometer. The first trial (estimation) consisted of an incremental protocol designed to elicit a range of work outputs (WO) and heart rates (HR). The subjects indicated their perception of effort using a 15-point scale at each intensity level. In the second trial (production), 7-14 days later, the subjects were asked to produce exercise intensities corresponding to five levels of RPE: 15, 11, 17, 13, and 19. Data analysis revealed high Pearson correlation coefficients between HR and RPE (r = 0.95, P < 0.01) and WO and RPE (r = 0.96, P < 0.01) during the estimation trial. In addition, significant correlations (P < 0.01) were obtained between the estimation and production trials for HR (r = 0.82) and WO (r = 0.84). Posthoc analysis of variance revealed that the observed differences in mean HR were not significant (P > 0.05) at three of the five intensity levels (RPE 15, 17 and 19), but were at the two lowest RPE levels (11 and 13). Significant mean differences in WO were seen at all but RPE 17. These data support the validity of the RPE scale as a measure of physiological strain among competitive male rowers, and offer support for its use as a method of regulating the intensity of rowing ergometry, especially at higher levels.

Indexed as

AdultAnaerobic ThresholdEnergy MetabolismErgometryExerciseHeart RateHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID8820897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.