ReviewDrugs & aging1996
Mitoxantrone: a review of its pharmacological properties and use in acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia.
Review in Drugs & aging, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- GDF-15 upregulates the SLC7A11/GPX4 signaling axis and promotes mitoxantrone resistance in AML cells.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Mitoxantrone-liposome SensitizesJournal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Does physical exercise improve or deteriorate treatment of multiple sclerosis with mitoxantrone? Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis study in rats.BMC neuroscience · 2022Article
- Cancer immunotherapy via combining oncolytic virotherapy with chemotherapy: recent advances.Oncolytic virotherapy · 2016Review
- Short-chain glycoceramides promote intracellular mitoxantrone delivery from novel nanoliposomes into breast cancer cells.Pharmaceutical research · 2015Article
- Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor-mediated delivery of mitoxantrone using LHRH analogs modified with PEGylated liposomes.International journal of nanomedicine · 2010Article
- Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis.CNS drugs · 2004Review
- Minimising the long-term adverse effects of childhood leukaemia therapy.Drug safety · 2002Review
- Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of hormone-resistant advanced prostate cancer.Drugs & aging · 1997Review
- Cancer chemotherapy in older adults. A tolerability perspective.Drugs & aging · 1997Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia (ANLL) is a malignant condition strongly associated with advancing age. Of adult acute leukaemias, 80 to 85% are classified as ANLL, with more than half of all patients being aged over 60 years. Although advancing age has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor in ANLL, recent clinical trials have shown good results in patients aged 60 years and over after coadministration of the anthracenedione antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone with cytarabine. In 1 study in particular, which involved patients aged 60 to 81 years, no correlation was found between increasing age and response rate. However results of a major clinical trial showed age greater than 60 years to be associated with poorer outcomes. Mitoxantrone as initial induction treatment is at least as effective as daunorubicin when either drug is given in combination with cytarabine to patients with previously untreated ANLL. Complete response rates in randomised comparative trials were 53 to 67% after mitoxantrone with cytarabine and 37 to 70% after daunorubicin with cytarabine. In a major US study, significantly more patients achieved a complete response after 1 treatment cycle of mitoxantrone and cytarabine than after daunorubicin and cytarabine. Mitoxantrone has also been effective in inducing complete remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory ANLL, mainly in combination with other antineoplastic agents. Overall survival appears similar after treatment with regimens containing either mitoxantrone or daunorubicin in patients with ANLL, although there have been reports of trends towards increased survival rates with mitoxantrone. The incidence of cardiotoxicity appears low in patients with ANLL who have received mitoxantrone. Lower cardiotoxicity of mitoxantrone relative to daunorubicin has not been conclusively demonstrated in patients with ANLL, although trials in patients with breast cancer have shown mitoxantrone to cause fewer cardiac adverse effects than doxorubicin. This is of particular interest in the elderly, as this group of patients is especially susceptible to the effects of anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity. Thus, mitoxantrone is a suitable first-line agent for the induction of remission in patients with ANLL, with clearly demonstrated efficacy in patients aged 60 years and over.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.