Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8819758›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology1996

Description of interacting channel gating using a stochastic Markovian model.

K Manivannan, R T Mathias, E Gudowska-Nowak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K ManivannanDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794, USA.
R T Mathias
E Gudowska-Nowak

Funding

VOLUME REGULATION IN NORMAL AND CATARACTOUS LENSESR01EY006391 · NEI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MATHIAS, RICHARD T · 1985 to 2014
$5.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY06391NHLBI NIH HHS HL54031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-channel recordings from membrane patches frequently exhibit multiple conductance levels. In some preparations, the steady-state probabilities of observing these levels do not follow a binomial distribution. This behavior has been reported in sodium channels, potassium channels, acetylcholine receptor channels and gap junction channels. A non-binomial distribution suggests interaction of the channels or the presence of channels or the presence of channels with different open probabilities. However, the current trace sometimes exhibits single transitions spanning several levels. Since the probability of simultaneous transitions of independent channels is infinitesimally small, such observations strongly suggest a cooperative gating behavior. We present a Markov model to describe the cooperative gating of channels using only the all-points current amplitude histograms for the probability of observing the various conductance levels. We investigate the steady-state (or equilibrium) properties of a system of N channels and provide a scheme to express all the probabilities in terms of just two parameters. The main feature of our model is that lateral interaction of channels gives rise to cooperative gating. Another useful feature is the introduction of the language of graph theory which can potentially provide a different avenue to study ion channel kinetics. We write down explicit expressions for systems of two, three and four channels and provide a procedure to describe the system of N channels.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingMarkov ChainsModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell MembraneGap JunctionsIon ChannelsMathematicsPatch-Clamp TechniquesReceptors, CholinergicIon ChannelsReceptors, Cholinergic

Identifiers

PMID8819758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.