ArticleJournal of medical genetics1996
Attitudes to predictive DNA testing in familial adenomatous polyposis.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Gene Polyposis-Related Syndromes.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Childbirth after surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis in Japan.Surgery today · 2017Article
- We Don't Know What We Don't Know About Adolescent and Young Adult Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-Related Colorectal Cancer.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2015Article
- Attitudes toward genetic testing in childhood and reproductive decision-making for familial adenomatous polyposis.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2010Article
- Familial adenomatous polyposis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2009Review
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited cancer: familial adenomatous polyposis coli.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attitudes to predictive DNA testing for familial adenomatous polyposis were documented in 62 affected adults. Patient views on prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy for this disorder were sought, as were opinions on the most suitable age to offer predictive testing for at risk children and the most appropriate age to begin screening. While 15 (24%) of those questioned stated that they would proceed to termination of pregnancy if a prenatal test indicated that the unborn baby was affected, in clinical practice no one has yet requested this option. Six (10%) people who had refrained from having children for fear of passing on the polyposis gene felt that the arrival of prenatal testing would enable them to consider planning a family. The majority of patients (93%) said they would like their children tested by DNA analysis at birth or in infancy, but felt that 10 to 12 years was the most appropriate time to discuss the diagnosis with the child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.