Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8818584›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging1996

Aging and haemopoiesis. Implications for treatment with haemopoietic growth factors.

G S Chatta, D C Dale

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Susceptibility of the aging lung to environmental injury.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2010
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Innate immunity and aging.Experimental gerontology · 2008
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G S ChattaDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. chatta@u.washington.edu
D C Dale

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senescence of the lympho-haemopoietic system is associated with an increased incidence of neoplasia, autoimmune diseases and infections. Myelosuppression, either in the context of cancer chemotherapy or in the face of severe infections, commonly manifests as pancytopenia, and has an adverse impact on the prognosis of the elderly cancer patient by increasing infection and bleeding-related morbidity. The physiological basis of this blunted haemopoietic response is unclear, and has been ascribed to age-related deficits in marrow progenitor cell numbers, changes in the marrow microenvironment, decreased production of regulatory growth factors, or a combination of these mechanisms. These age-related deficits tend to be subtle and are only of clinical importance either when present cumulatively or under conditions of extreme haemopoietic stress. Furthermore, some of these deficits can be circumvented with the use of haemopoietic growth factors (HGFs). Thus, the availability in the clinic of various HGFs has had a tremendous impact on the care of the elderly cancer patient. The HGFs currently approved for use are: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and epoetin-alpha (recombinant human erythropoietin). However, we still need to better elucidate age-related changes in the early stages of haemopoiesis. The question of haemopoietic exhaustion, particularly under prolonged growth factor stimulation, is real and still unanswered.

Indexed as

AgedAgingGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoiesisHematopoietic Cell Growth FactorsHumansGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Cell Growth Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.