ReviewDrugs & aging1996
Calcium antagonists in the elderly. A risk-benefit analysis.
Review in Drugs & aging, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isradipine plasma pharmacokinetics and exposure-response in early Parkinson's disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021Trial
- Verapamil and Alzheimer's Disease: Past, Present, and Future.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Traditional and Novel Migraine Therapy in the Aging Population.Current pain and headache reports · 2019Review
- Calcium channel blocker class heterogeneity: select aspects of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2005Review
- Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: basic principles and practical applications.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2004Review
- [Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in the aged].Der Internist · 2003Review
- Cardiovascular drug therapy in the elderly: theoretical and practical considerations.Drugs & aging · 2003Review
- Drug dosage in the elderly. Is it rational?Drugs & aging · 1998Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Calcium antagonists are effective in lowering blood pressure, relieving anginal symptoms and improving exercise tolerance in older and younger patients with coronary artery disease. Verapamil and diltiazem are effective in slowing ventricular response rates to supraventricular arrhythmias in both older and younger patients. Although they belong to at least 3 distinct chemical classes, a moderate decrease in the clearance of all calcium antagonists occurs with aging. Most clinical trials of these drugs have used the same dosages in older and younger patients, confounding analyses of sensitivity in older compared with younger patients. Greater reductions in blood pressure usually occur in older compared with younger patients receiving the same dosages of calcium antagonists; similarly, the dosage required to reduce blood pressure to a certain level is usually lower in older compared with younger patients. Drug acquisition costs are generally higher for calcium antagonists than for beta-blockers or diuretics. Compared with younger patients, greater heart rate suppression may be seen in older patients treated with verapamil and diltiazem; conversely, heart rate increases are usually seen with dihydropyridines. Calcium antagonists have not been shown to provide long-term benefits or decreased morbidity or mortality in elderly patients with hypertension. Verapamil, but not dihydropyridines, decreases mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without congestive heart failure. Calcium antagonists have not been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of acute stroke. Adverse effects, such as a postural hypotension, may be more frequent in elderly compared with younger patients. In addition, the elderly are at greater risk for drug interactions with calcium antagonists due to the higher likelihood that they are receiving other drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8818583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.