ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
Analysis of the effects of alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists on noradrenaline-mediated contraction of rat small mesenteric artery.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative systems pharmacology analysis of drug combination and scaling to humans: the interaction between noradrenaline and vasopressin in vasoconstriction.British journal of pharmacology · 2018Article
- Subtypes of functional alpha1-adrenoceptor.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2010Review
- Alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes involved in vasoconstrictor responses to exogenous and neurally released noradrenaline in rat femoral resistance arteries.British journal of pharmacology · 2004Article
- A comparison of effects measured with isotonic and isometric recording: II. Concentration-effect curves for physiological antagonists.British journal of pharmacology · 2001Article
- Analysis of alpha 1L-adrenoceptor pharmacology in rat small mesenteric artery.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. In this study, we examined the interaction between noradrenaline (NA) and phenylephrine (PE) with seven antagonists (prazosin, tamsulosin, phentolamine, WB-4101, 5-methylurapidil, spiperone and HV 723) in an attempt to characterize the alpha 1-adrenoceptor population of the rat isolated small mesenteric artery (SMA) preparation. 2. Six of the seven antagonists investigated produced concentration-dependent, parallel, rightward shift of the NA concentration-effect (E/[A]) curves. The exception was tamsulosin, which produced significant decrease of the upper asymptote. In the case of 5-methylurapidil and HV723, the Schild plot slope parameters were not significantly different from unity over the range of concentrations used. However, the Schild plot slopes obtained for the other antagonists were all significantly greater than unity, inconsistent with expectations for simple competitive antagonism. 3. HV723, prazosin and tamsulosin were also tested using PE as an agonist. All three antagonists produced concentration-dependent, parallel, rightward shifts of the PE curves and Schild analysis yielded slope parameters not significantly different from unity. The pKB estimates obtained for tamsulosin and prazosin were not significantly different from the pA2 values obtained when NA was used as agonist. In the case of HV723, the 95% confidence intervals for the pKB values yielded with NA and PE did not overlap (pKB = 8.80-9.13 and 8.15-8.77 for NA and PE, respectively). 4. In the absence of evidence to indicate that the steep Schild plots were due to failure to satisfy the basic criteria for quantitative analysis in a one-receptor system, we considered the possibility that the complexity was caused by an action of NA at inhibitory D1 receptors. The selective D1 receptor antagonists, SCH-23390 (10 nM), had no significant effect on the NA E/[A] control curve, but the apparent potency of 100 nM prazosin was reduced by approximately 3.5 fold. 5. This study indicates that the steep Schild plots obtained from the interaction between NA and alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists were due to the simultaneous activation of inhibitory D1 receptors by NA. Notwithstanding this complexity, our explanatory model of the system (see Appendix) suggests that the antagonist affinity values estimated in the absence of D1 receptor block were not significantly affected by this other action of NA. The low affinity estimate obtained for prazosin suggests that the pharmacologically-defined alpha IL-subtype operates in the SMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.