ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology1996
Prenatal care and prevention of preterm birth. A case-control study in southern Spain.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the relationship between conditional cash transfer programme on preterm births: a retrospective longitudinal study using the 100 million Brazilian cohort.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a comparison of indices.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The value of prenatal care is controversial and difficult to establish. A national policy for improving perinatal outcomes was proposed and applied throughout Andalusia (Southern Spain) in 1984. Here we report the results of an evaluation of this health care program as regards the prevention of preterm delivery. Effectiveness of prenatal care was assessed on the basis of two case-control studies in a hospital setting: one performed before the program was implemented (1981-1982) and the second one six years after the program began (1990-1993). A total of 229 cases and 395 controls for the period 1981-1982, and 207 cases and 381 controls for 1990-1993 were selected. Prenatal care was assessed based on the number of prenatal care visits, the date of the first visit, and an American composite index adjusting for gestational age. Multiple-factor adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression analysis. The use of prenatal care significantly improved across time: the proportion of women receiving no prenatal care decreased from over 30% to less than 5%, and the proportion of women starting prenatal care in the first trimester for 1990-1993 was three times greater than the figure for 1981-1982. In the 1981-1982 case-control study, the date of first visit and the composite index were shown to be unrelated to preterm birth risk; and the number of visits yielded a significant association, although no definite trend could be established. In the 1990-1993 case-control study, a clear and significant relationship was observed between the number of prenatal care visits, the trimester of the first visit, and the adequacy of care according to the composite index. This latter variable, reflecting a more stringent standard of prenatal care, was selected by a stepwise logistic regression analysis as the best predictor for preterm birth risk. The results suggest that the present Andalusian program helps prevent preterm delivery. Nonetheless, its minimum standards should be raised to further decrease preterm birth risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.