Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8815094›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1996

Fluconazole and amphotericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method compared with E-test and semiautomated broth microdilution test.

J van Eldere, L Joosten, V Verhaeghe, I Surmont

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Antifungal Susceptibility ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates from blood cultures by microbroth dilution and the E test.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1997
    Article
  16. Evaluation of the E test for fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida albicans isolates from oropharyngeal candidiasis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1997
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J van EldereRega Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
L Joosten
V Verhaeghe
I Surmont

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative study of fluconazole and amphotericin B susceptibility testing was performed with 68 clinical Candida species isolates and three test methods. The methods used were an agar diffusion method (E-test) and two broth dilution methods, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) reference broth macrodilution method and an in-house-prepared semiautomated broth microdilution method based on the Bioscreen turbidometer. In the microdilution method, growth of the yeasts was measured continuously by the automatic turbidometer (Bioscreen), which permitted precise and objective determination of endpoints. MIC endpoints were read after 24 h for the microdilution method and the E-test. Amphotericin B susceptibility testing with the NCCLS method and the E-test yielded comparable results in 89% of the tests, meaning that the endpoints obtained were identical or differed by no more than 2 twofold dilutions. The NCCLS and broth microdilution tests scored 97% comparable results, and the E-test and the broth microdilution test yielded 90% comparable results. Fluconazole susceptibility testing produced 96% comparable results with the NCCLS test and the E-test, 100% comparable results with the NCCLS and the microdilution methods, and 98.5% comparable results with the microdilution method and the E-test. We conclude that the E-test and the Bioscreen microdilution method are valuable alternatives to the NCCLS reference method for routine susceptibility testing of Candida species with fluconazole and amphotericin B.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCandidaEvaluation Studies as TopicFluconazoleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID8815094
PMCPMC228903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.