Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8815032›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research1996

Effects of dopamine and fluphenazine on field potential amplitude in the salamander olfactory bulb.

M R Gurski, K A Hamilton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M R GurskiDepartment of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Medical School, Shreveport 71130-3932, USA.
K A Hamilton
Louisiana State University · USLouisiana State University in Shreveport · US

Funding

ODOR RESPONSES AND ANATOMY OF OLFACTORY BULB NEURONSR01DC000300 · NIDCD · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI HAMILTON, KATHRYN A · 1989 to 1991
–
NIDCD NIH HHS DC00300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of dopamine (DA) and fluphenazine (FLU), a phenothiazine DA receptor antagonist, were examined in the salamander olfactory bulb. Field potentials were recorded in the granule cell layer of superfused hemibrain preparations, and the amplitude of the large positive peak was compared following stimulation of the olfactory nerve (ON) and lateral olfactory tract (OT). In preparations superfused with normal amphibian Ringer's solution, the large peak occurred 14-21 ms after either ON or OT stimulation. It therefore appeared to reflect the activation of granule cell synapses with mitral cells, as in olfactory bulbs of other species. In three groups of preparations that were superfused with single concentrations of DA, significant decreases were observed in the amplitude of the large peak of ON- and OT-evoked potentials with increases in concentration from 5-200 microM. Moreover, with 5 microM DA and 50 microM DA, significant decreases were observed in the amplitude of the large peak of ON-evoked potentials with increases in superfusion time from 1-15 min. With each DA concentration tested, the mean percentage decrease in the ON-evoked potentials was significantly larger than the mean percentage decrease in the OT-evoked potentials. In five groups of preparations that were superfused with single concentrations of FLU, significant decreases were also observed in the amplitude of the large peak of ON- and OT-evoked potentials with increases in concentration from 0.5-150 microM. With 100 microM FLU and 150 microM FLU, significant decreases were observed in the amplitude of the large peak of both ON- and OT-evoked potentials with increases in superfusion time from 5-10 min. With each FLU concentration tested, the mean percentage change in the ON-evoked potentials was significantly larger than the mean percentage change in the OT-evoked potentials. The stronger effects of DA and FLU on the ON-evoked than OT-evoked potentials suggested that both drugs target receptors in the rostral (superficial) layers of the salamander olfactory bulb which have a higher density or affinity for DA and FLU than receptors in the more caudal (deep) layers of the bulb. When preparations were superfused with an equimolar mixture of DA and FLU at the ED50 concentrations (50 microM for both), FLU blocked approximately 50% of the decrease in the amplitude of the ON-evoked potentials relative to the decrease measured in preparations superfused with DA alone. Since FLU depressed the amplitude of ON-evoked potentials when it was tested alone, however, the rostral DA receptors could occur on both the olfactory receptor cell axons and their postsynaptic targets, or FLU could limit mitral/tufted cell excitation by affecting other types of receptors or voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. Results of this study which show that DA and FLU reduce the amplitude of evoked potentials in the salamander olfactory bulb provide evidence for the occurrence of DA receptors in the amphibian brain. More importantly, the stronger effects of DA and FLU on the ON-evoked than OT-evoked potentials suggest that the DA receptors could function to limit the excitation of cells at an early synaptic level in the salamander bulb. By modulating spatiotemporal patterns of synaptic activity in the glomerular layer, the receptors could profoundly influence the initial encoding of information about odors.

Indexed as

AmbystomaAnimalsDopamineDopamine AntagonistsElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyEvoked PotentialsFluphenazineNeuronsOlfactory BulbOlfactory NerveDopamineDopamine AntagonistsFluphenazine

Identifiers

PMID8815032
OpenAlexW1964402311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.