ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1996
Remodelling of adult cardiac muscle cells in culture: dynamic process of disorganization and reorganization of myofibrils.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organisational alteration of cardiac myofilament proteins by hyperglycaemia in mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2021Article
- Extracellular Matrix in Regulation of Contractile System in Cardiomyocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The myofibrils of adult rat cardiac muscle cells in long-term culture initially break down and later reassemble into mature myofibrils. The objective of this study is to examine the disorganization process of myofibrils and to determine how disorganized myofibrillar proteins, myosin, titin, actin, and alpha-actinin are reorganized into mature myofibrils in adult cells. After dismantlement of myofibrils during initial culture period (24-72 h), myofibrillar proteins became disorganized into amorphous form. These proteins later were observed in vesicular, amorphous, and nonstriated fibrillar forms. Some vesicular structures, containing mainly myosin, titin, alpha-actin, and alpha-actinin were observed on the outer surfaces of the cell and outside the cell body. Such vesicles containing F-actin were rare. Punctate structures of alpha-actinin emerged from the pre-existing amorphous alpha-actinin along with the appearance of mostly titin periodicities. The periodicities of alpha-actinin later became prevalent, followed by the appearance of periodicities of actin. alpha-actinin provided an initiation point on which titin and actin became associated, forming titin-associated I-Z-I structures. Titin traversed the I-bands on either side of the Z-line. The phalloidin-stained I-Z-I structures bound to antibodies to muscle specific sarcomeric proteins (titin, alpha-actin, alpha-actinin). The differentiation of myosin periodicities lagged behind those of titin, alpha-actinin, and actin although presarcomeric structures of immunolabelled titin and myosin were very closely linked in their distributions in the formative myofibrils. Variations in the temporal sequence of emergence of periodicities of alpha-actinin and myosin were observed among certain myocytes. Also observed was the variation of the temporal sequence of emergence of titin and actin periodicities among different myocytes and within a single myocyte. Even in the late stage of culture (30 days), when the cell body was packed with myofibrils, the myocytes contained remnants of amorphous myofibrillar proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.