ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996
Deprivation payments to general practitioners: limitations of census data.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unequal to the task: deprivation, health and UK general practice at the millennium.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001Review
- Rationale for the new GP deprivation payment scheme in England: effects of moving from electoral ward to enumeration district underprivileged area scores.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001Article
- Does Council Tax Valuation Band (CTVB) correlate with Under-Privileged Area 8 (UPA8) score and could it be a better 'Jarman Index'?BMC public health · 2001Article
- Refugees, asylum seekers, and general practice: room for improvement?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000Article
- The impact of hepatitis C in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000Article
- The impact of area deprivation on differences in health: does the choice of the geographical classification matter?Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2000Article
- Refugees and primary care: tackling the inequalities.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1998Review
- General practitioner deprivation payments in Northern Ireland: is the current system equitable?The Ulster medical journal · 1998Article
- More equitable systems for allocating general practice deprivation payments: financial consequences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998Article
- Trends in colorectal cancer care in southern England, 1989-1993: using HES data to inform cancer services reviews.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 1998Article
- Deprivation payments and workload.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The census data from which deprivation payments have been calculated since June 1995 suffer from limitations including underenumeration; under counting of homeless people and refugees, and artefactual errors because of the way in which the 1991 census data were tabulated. These limitations reduced the fairness of the changes that many practices experienced in their deprivation payments. The validity of the current system of deprivation payments would be improved if these limitations were borne in mind when allocating payments to practices and if enumeration districts were used as the basis of payments rather than electoral wards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.