ArticleGenetics1996
Mismatch repair mutants in yeast are not defective in transcription-coupled DNA repair of UV-induced DNA damage.
Article in Genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Involvement of mismatch repair in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair.Human cell · 2005Review
- Article
- Mouse mismatch repair gene Msh2 is not essential for transcription-coupled repair of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers.Oncogene · 2001Article
- Transcription-coupled DNA repair in yeast transcription factor IIE (TFIIE) mutants.Nucleic acids research · 2000Article
- Transcription-coupled repair of DNA damage: unanticipated players, unexpected complexities.American journal of human genetics · 1999Review
- Physical interaction between components of DNA mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998Article
- Recognition and repair of compound DNA lesions (base damage and mismatch) by human mismatch repair and excision repair systems.Molecular and cellular biology · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription-coupled repair, the targeted repair of the transcribed strands of active genes, is defective in bacteria, yeast, and human cells carrying mutations in mfd, RAD26 and ERCC6, respectively. Other factors probably are also uniquely involved in transcription-repair coupling. Recently, a defect was described in transcription-coupled repair for Escherichia coli mismatch repair mutants and human tumor cell lines with mutations in mismatch repair genes. We examined removal of UV-induced DNA damage in yeast strains mutated in mismatch repair genes in an effort to confirm a defect in transcription-coupled repair in this system. In addition, we determined the contribution of the mismatch repair gene MSH2 to transcription-coupled repair in the absence of global genomic repair using rad7 delta mutants. We also determined whether the Rad26-independent transcription-coupled repair observed in rad26 delta and rad7 delta rad26 delta mutants depends on MSH2 by examining repair deficiencies of rad26 delta msh2 delta and rad7 delta rad26 delta msh2 delta mutants. We found no defects in transcription-coupled repair caused by mutations in the mismatch repair genes MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, and MSH3. Yeast appears to differ from bacteria and human cells in the capacity for transcription-coupled repair in a mismatch repair mutant background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.