Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8807062›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1996

Population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in critically ill patients.

F Bressolle, A Gouby, J M Martinez, P Joubert, G Saissi, R Guillaud, R Gomeni

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Target attainment of cefotaxime in critically ill children with meningococcal septic shock as a model for cefotaxime dosing in severe pediatric sepsis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Amikacin Therapy in Japanese Pediatric Patients: Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Study of relationship between volume of distribution and body weight application to amikacin.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2014
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F BressolleLaboratoire de pharmacocinétique, Faculté de Pharmacie, Montpellier Cedex 01, France.
A Gouby
J M Martinez
P Joubert
G Saissi
R Guillaud
R Gomeni
Laboratoire de Thermique et Energie de Nantes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin were determined in a population of 20 adults and 36 pediatric patients admitted into an intensive care unit. Amikacin was administered by repeated intravenous infusion over 0.5 h (600 to 1,350 mg for adults; 70 to 1,500 mg for children). The number of administrations ranged from 2 to 17, and the number of samples collected from each patient ranged from 2 to 70. The population enrolled in the study had large variabilities in age (0.5 to 85 years), weight (6 to 95 kg), height (72 to 187 cm), creatinine clearance rate (18 to 110 ml/min), blood urea nitrogen concentration (1.5 to 15 mmol/liter), and total protein concentration (30 to 91 g/liter). The mean population parameters and their interindividual variabilities were obtained for an initial group of 44 patients (16 adults and 28 children). A two-compartment model was fitted to the population data by using the computer program P-PHARM. Model selection was guided by evaluation of the minimum objective function and the weighted residuals. The population analysis has been performed with the complete set of the collected data, including the individual serum amikacin concentration together with the individual estimate of the creatinine clearance values. The potential sources of variability in the population parameters were investigated by using patients' age, height, weight, creatinine clearance, blood urea nitrogen concentration, and total protein concentration as covariables. A test group of 12 additional patients (4 adults and 8 children) was used to evaluate the predictive performances of the population parameters. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters were computed by a Bayesian fitting procedure. From the resulting individualized values of the parameters, the concentrations of amikacin in the serum of the patients were calculated. To evaluate the performance of the Bayesian estimation, the experimental concentrations were compared with the predicted ones. The Bayesian approached developed in the study accurately predicts amikacin concentrations in serum and allows for the estimation of amikacin pharmacokinetics parameters, minimizing the risk of bias in the prediction. This was demonstrated in patients with both stable and unstable renal functions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBayes TheoremBody Fluid CompartmentsChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessFemaleHumansInfantAmikacinAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID8807062
PMCPMC163395
OpenAlexW2127386605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.