Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8806378›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health1996

Occasional smoking in a Minnesota working population.

D J Hennrikus, R W Jeffery, H A Lando

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The feasibility of smoking reduction: an update.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2005
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Counseling nondaily smokers about secondhand smoke as a cessation message: a pilot randomized trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preparing for the Quit Day: Comparing Beliefs of Nondaily Versus Daily Young Adult Smokers as They Prepare for a Quit Attempt.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Infrequent and Frequent Nondaily Smokers and Daily Smokers: Their Characteristics and Other Tobacco Use Patterns.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Determinants of Light and Intermittent Smoking in the United States: Results from Three Pooled National Health Surveys.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Correlates of Converted and Native Nondaily Smoking.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D J HennrikusDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55454-1015, USA.
R W Jeffery
H A Lando

Funding

WORKSITE HEALTH INCENTIVES PROGRAMR01HL034740 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI JEFFERY, ROBERT W · 1987 to 1991
–
NHLBI NIH HHS 3R01-HL34740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the prevalence of occasional smoking in a population of working adults, compared the characteristics of occasional and daily smokers, and prospectively examined the long-term smoking patterns of occasional smokers.

methodsAt 32 Minnesota work sites, 5681 randomly selected workers were surveyed at baseline; 5248 of these were surveyed again 2 years later. A cross-sectional sample of 5817 workers was also surveyed at follow-up.

resultsOccasional smokers constituted 18.3% of all smokers in the baseline sample and 21.5% of all smokers in the cross-sectional sample surveyed 2 years later. Baseline occasional smokers were significantly more likely than daily smokers to have quit at follow-up. Job monotony or repetitiveness was related to an increase to daily smoking at follow-up among baseline occasional smokers, and a change to a more restrictive workplace smoking policy was associated with quitting.

conclusionsThe results confirm that a substantial proportion of smokers are low-rate users and suggest that the proportion may be rising. Further research on this group is warranted.

Indexed as

EmploymentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMinnesotaOrganizational PolicyPrevalenceRandom AllocationResearch DesignSmokingSmoking CessationWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID8806378
PMCPMC1380589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.