Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8804602›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1996

Effects of buffer concentration on voltage-gated H+ currents: does diffusion limit the conductance?

T E DeCoursey, V V Cherny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcendent Aspects of Proton Channels.Annual review of physiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Expression of HProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Zn2+ to probe voltage-gated proton (Hv1) channels.The Journal of general physiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Voltage and pH sensing by the voltage-gated proton channel, HJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  11. CrossTalk proposal: Proton permeation through HThe Journal of physiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Philosophy of voltage-gated proton channels.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014
    Review
  16. Analysis of electrophysiological properties and responses of neutrophils.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Consequences of dimerization of the voltage-gated proton channel.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2013
    Review
  19. Voltage-gated proton channels.Comprehensive Physiology · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T E DeCourseyDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, illinois 60612, USA. tdecours@rpslmc.edu
V V Cherny

Funding

VOLTAGE-GATED PROTON CHANNELS IN ALVEOLAR EPITHELIUMR01HL052671 · NHLBI · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DECOURSEY, THOMAS E · 1995 to 2003
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL52671NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL052671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The single-channel proton conductance of the voltage-gated H(+)-selective channel, like that of the F0 component of the H(+)-ATPase, is nearly constant over a wide range of pH encompassing the physiological range. To examine the possible contributions of buffer diffusion and buffer-channel proton transfer reactions to this phenomenon, the effects of buffer concentration on voltage-activated H+ currents were explored in voltage-clamped rat alveolar epithelial cells. Changes in the external buffer concentration ([B]o), evaluated using the whole-cell configuration, had only small effects on H+ currents (IH). Lowering [B]o from 100 to 1 mM did not alter the voltage-activation curve or reversal potential (Vrev) but reduced IH, typically by 10-30%. Changes in internal buffer concentration ([B]i), examined in inside-out patches, usually altered IH more distinctly and subtly changed the kinetics. Overall, the effects of changing buffer concentration were small and subtle. The maximum attenuation of the single-channel H+ current at 1 mM buffer was estimated to be approximately 20% at either mouth of the H+ channel. Therefore, the rate-determining step in H+ permeation is neither deprotonation of buffer at the inner mouth of the channel nor protonation of buffer at the external surface. Evidently the rate of H+ permeation through the channel is itself small enough that diffusion of buffer in bulk solution does not directly limit the conductance significantly.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsBuffersDiffusionHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIn Vitro TechniquesIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsMaleMembrane PotentialsPatch-Clamp TechniquesProtonsPulmonary AlveoliRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyBuffersIon ChannelsProtons

Identifiers

PMID8804602
PMCPMC1233470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.