Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8799154›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1996

Gene recognition via spliced sequence alignment.

M S Gelfand, A A Mironov, P A Pevzner

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 309 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Whole-Genome Alignment and Comparative Annotation.Annual review of animal biosciences · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Physico-chemical fingerprinting of RNA genes.Nucleic acids research · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Novel Gene Discovery in the Human Malaria Parasite using Nucleosome Positioning Data.Computational systems bioinformatics. Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M S GelfandInstitute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Puschino, Moscow, Russia.
A A Mironov
P A Pevzner
Institute of Protein Research · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene recognition is one of the most important problems in computational molecular biology. Previous attempts to solve this problem were based on statistics, and applications of combinatorial methods for gene recognition were almost unexplored. Recent advances in large-scale cDNA sequencing open a way toward a new approach to gene recognition that uses previously sequenced genes as a clue for recognition of newly sequenced genes. This paper describes a spliced alignment algorithm and software tool that explores all possible exon assemblies in polynomial time and finds the multiexon structure with the best fit to a related protein. Unlike other existing methods, the algorithm successfully recognizes genes even in the case of short exons or exons with unusual codon usage; we also report correct assemblies for genes with more than 10 exons. On a test sample of human genes with known mammalian relatives, the average correlation between the predicted and actual proteins was 99%. The algorithm correctly reconstructed 87% of genes and the rare discrepancies between the predicted and real exon-intron structures were caused either by short (less than 5 amino acids) initial/terminal exons or by alternative splicing. Moreover, the algorithm predicts human genes reasonably well when the homologous protein is nonvertebrate or even prokaryotic. The surprisingly good performance of the method was confirmed by extensive simulations: in particular, with target proteins at 160 accepted point mutations (PAM) (25% similarity), the correlation between the predicted and actual genes was still as high as 95%.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsExonsGenesPattern Recognition, AutomatedRNA SplicingAnimalsBiological EvolutionDatabases, FactualHumansMathematical ComputingModels, TheoreticalSequence AlignmentTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID8799154
PMCPMC38595
OpenAlexW2149238618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.