ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal1996
Disruption of microfilaments alters laminin synthesis but not laminin trafficking in NHEK in vitro.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laminin synthesis and deposition are concomitant with the development of a basal lamina between the human epidermis and the underlying dermis. One of the challenges in tissue engineering of human epidermal models is to develop substrates and conditions that encourage the development of a basement membrane. The purpose of this study was to determine if actin filaments and/or microtubules are involved in the synthesis/secretion of laminin by normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) in vitro. NHEK synthesize and secrete laminin subunits B1, B2, and M but little, if any, of laminin subunit A. Data indicate that disruption of microfilaments by the destabilizing agent, cytochalasin D, had no apparent effect on the relative synthesis rates of most cytosolic proteins as revealed by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel electrophoresis. This drug, however, increased laminin B2 synthesis several fold over untreated controls. This enhanced synthetic rate was independent of the type of collagen matrix on which the NHEK were grown. Similar increases in synthesis of the M and B1 laminin chains were not observed. To determine if this increase in synthesis lead to increases in laminin B2 secretion, laminin B2 was immunoprecipitated from both the apical and basal domains of NHEK cells grown on microporous membranes. While more laminin B1, B2, and M were secreted basally than apically, an observation consistent with laminin's role in basal lamina formation, cytochalasin D had no apparent effect on either basal or apical laminin B2 secretion. Experiments with the microtubule destabilizer, nocodazole, showed no similar effects on laminin synthesis and/or secretion. We conclude that (a) disruption of the actin network in NHEK selectively increases the synthesis of laminin B2, (b) the secretion of laminin B2 from NHEK cells is not governed by either the microfilamentous cytoskeleton or the amount of laminin synthesized by NHEK, and (c) disruption of the microtubular network does not alter laminin synthesis or secretion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.