Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8787963›Full record

ReviewThe Histochemical journal1995

Cytochemical detection systems for in situ hybridization, and the combination with immunocytochemistry, 'who is still afraid of red, green and blue?'.

E J Speel, F C Ramaekers, A H Hopman

Abstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in The Histochemical journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anatomical Methods to Study the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E J SpeelDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology & Genetics, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
F C Ramaekers
A H Hopman
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An overview is given of the different non-radioactive cytochemical detection methodologies that are currently utilized to localize nucleic acid sequences in chromosomes, cells and tissue sections. Dependent on the reporter molecule (fluorochrome, enzyme or hapten) that is used to modify the appropriate nucleic acid probe, and the sensitivity that is required, the in situ hybridized sequences can be detected either directly after hybridization or indirectly, using cytochemical detection and amplification layers. These may then contain antibody and/or avidin molecules conjugated to fluorochromes, enzymes or colloidial gold particles. Since the choice of a suitable probe-labelling method in combination with a fluorescence, enzyme cytochemical or immunogold-silver detection procedure is often determined by the user's own practical experience and applications, the different detection methodologies are compared with each other in detail with respect to sensitivity, resolution, applicability for multiple probe detection, and signal evaluation. Furthermore, procedures are reviewed for the combination of in situ hybridization with immunocytochemical detection of proteins and/or incorporated bromodeoxyuridine, which allow the simultaneous visualization of genomic phenotypic and/or cell cycle parameters in the same sample. Possible improvements with respect to sensitivity, specificity and multiplicity of the detection methods, which may be interesting for one's own experimental design, are finally being discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNAForecastingHistocytochemistryHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationRNASensitivity and SpecificityDNARNA

Identifiers

PMID8787963
OpenAlexW2144248834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.