ReviewThe Histochemical journal1995
Cytochemical detection systems for in situ hybridization, and the combination with immunocytochemistry, 'who is still afraid of red, green and blue?'.
Review in The Histochemical journal, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomical Methods to Study the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- CARD In Situ Hybridization: Sights and Signals.Endocrine pathology · 1999Article
- Subtracted, unique-sequence, in situ hybridization: experimental and diagnostic applications.The American journal of pathology · 1998Article
- Interphase cytogenetics and its role in molecular diagnostics of solid tumors.The American journal of pathology · 1998Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An overview is given of the different non-radioactive cytochemical detection methodologies that are currently utilized to localize nucleic acid sequences in chromosomes, cells and tissue sections. Dependent on the reporter molecule (fluorochrome, enzyme or hapten) that is used to modify the appropriate nucleic acid probe, and the sensitivity that is required, the in situ hybridized sequences can be detected either directly after hybridization or indirectly, using cytochemical detection and amplification layers. These may then contain antibody and/or avidin molecules conjugated to fluorochromes, enzymes or colloidial gold particles. Since the choice of a suitable probe-labelling method in combination with a fluorescence, enzyme cytochemical or immunogold-silver detection procedure is often determined by the user's own practical experience and applications, the different detection methodologies are compared with each other in detail with respect to sensitivity, resolution, applicability for multiple probe detection, and signal evaluation. Furthermore, procedures are reviewed for the combination of in situ hybridization with immunocytochemical detection of proteins and/or incorporated bromodeoxyuridine, which allow the simultaneous visualization of genomic phenotypic and/or cell cycle parameters in the same sample. Possible improvements with respect to sensitivity, specificity and multiplicity of the detection methods, which may be interesting for one's own experimental design, are finally being discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8787963W2144248834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.