Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8786975›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research1995

Characterization of LLC-PK1 kidney epithelial cells as an in vitro model for studying renal tubular reabsorption of protein drugs.

Y Takakura, T Morita, M Fujikawa, M Hayashi, H Sezaki, M Hashida, R T Borchardt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y TakakuraDepartment of Drug Delivery Research, Kyoto University, Japan.
T Morita
M Fujikawa
M Hayashi
H Sezaki
M Hashida
R T Borchardt
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess whether LLC-PK1 renal epithelial cells could serve as an in vitro model for studying the renal tubular reabsorption of protein drugs.

methodsThe association of 111In-labeled model protein drugs, bovine serum albumin (BSA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI), and [Asu1.7]-eel calcitonin (Asu-ECT), with the monolayers of LLC-PK1 renal epithelial cells was characterized under various conditions.

resultsThe cellular association of these proteins was temperature-dependent and varied according to the protein. Saturation kinetics were observed for STI association, with the apparent Km and Vmax values determined to be 66.3 micrograms/ml and 250 ng/mg protein/min, respectively. The association of STI decreased with increases in medium pH from 5.4 to 8.4 and was inhibited significantly by 2,4-dinitrophenol, sodium azide, cytochalasin B, and colchicine, suggesting that the cellular association involved endocytosis. Mutual inhibition was observed in competitive binding experiments with the four protein drugs, suggesting that they shared a common binding site on the luminal membrane of LLC-PK1 cells. Taken together, these findings show that a variety of protein drugs bind to LLC-PK1 cells in a non-specific manner and possibly undergo endocytosis, a phenomenon that is similar to in vivo proximal tubular reabsorption.

conclusionsLLC-PK1 renal epithelial cells would be a suitable model system for the study of the renal proximal tubular reabsorption of protein drugs.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAlbuminsAnimalsCells, CulturedDrug CarriersKidney TubulesLLC-PK1 CellsModels, BiologicalProteinsRadioligand AssaySwineTime FactorsAlbuminsDrug CarriersProteins

Identifiers

PMID8786975
OpenAlexW330910701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.