ArticleHuman genetics1996
Deletions in the SMN gene in infantile and adult spinal muscular atrophy patients from the same family.
Article in Human genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic strategies for spinal muscular atrophy: the history and future perspective.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, a gene determining spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), termed survival motor neuron (SMN) gene, has been isolated from the 5q13 region. This gene has been found to be deleted in most patients with childhood-onset SMA. We have studied the SMN gene in a clinically heterogeneous family, including one patient affected by infantile chronic SMA and three subjects with mild adult-onset muscle weakness. Deletions in the SMN gene were detected in all of these patients, indicating that the childhood and adult SMAs are genetically homogeneous in this family. Genotyping of the family members established that the three mildly affected individuals were homozygous for the same haplotype from the SMA region, whereas the more severely affected patient was heterozygous with one different haplotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.