Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8786010›Full record

ReviewDiabetologia1995

Role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of NIDDM.

H Yki-Järvinen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetologia, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pancreatic function, type 2 diabetes, and metabolism in aging.International journal of endocrinology · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Pancreatic β-Cell Mass as a Pharmacologic Target in Diabetes.McGill journal of medicine : MJM : an international forum for the advancement of medical sciences by students · 2009
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Insulin resistance.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1996
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

H Yki-JärvinenDepartment of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The above discussion illustrating the multitude of variables which influence insulin sensitivity in normal subjects challenges the prevailing view that insulin sensitivity is genetically determined in patients with NIDDM. The lack of accurate quantitation of all determinants of insulin sensitivity in the cross-sectional studies, and the difficulty in distinguishing between insulin secretion and sensitivity in prospective studies implies that the inherited metabolic abnormality in NIDDM still remains to be defined. The methodological difficulties in assessing the fate of glucose in many insulin-resistant states raise the possibility that defects in glycogen synthesis may not be rate-limiting for insulin action. It seems more likely that defects in glucose transport or phosphorylation are rate-limiting for glucose disposal, and thus represent either the primary regulatory steps or the steps via which distal defects signal their influence on glucose uptake. The above considerations should not be interpreted to suggest that insulin resistance is unimportant in the pathogenesis of NIDDM. It clearly increases the risk of developing NIDDM, and more importantly, its early amelioration by lifestyle modification seems sufficient to prevent NIDDM.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAnimalsBlood GlucoseBody CompositionBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansInsulinPhysical FitnessBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID8786010
OpenAlexW2386775235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.