Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8785467›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging1996

Diabetic vascular injury and ACE. Potential for pharmacological prevention of complications of later life.

M E Cooper, D Vranes, J R Rumble

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M E CooperDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, West Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
D Vranes
J R Rumble
University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental studies have indicated that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have multiple actions on the kidney and blood vessels which include both haemodynamic and antitrophic effects. Inhibition of angiotensin II and potentiation of bradykinin have both been postulated to be major mechanisms in mediating the effects of ACE inhibitors. Clinical studies have indicated that these agents postpone end-stage renal failure in macroproteinuric patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Indeed, these drugs are useful in both hypertensive and normotensive diabetic patients with macroproteinuria. In IDDM patients with microalbuminuria, ACE inhibitors have been shown to decrease albuminuria and to retard the development of overt renal disease. The role of these agents in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and early or overt renal disease remains to be clearly delineated. However, preliminary studies suggest a similar beneficial renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitors in NIDDM. It should be appreciated that the presence of micro- or macroproteinuria in NIDDM is a predictor of cardiovascular rather than renal morbidity and mortality. The possibility of cardiovascular protection, in addition to renal protection, being conferred by these drugs needs to be considered in both IDDM and NIDDM, although this issue has not been evaluated in detail.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyHumansKininsTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsKinins

Identifiers

PMID8785467
OpenAlexW1996675914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.