Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8782099›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1996

Activation of Ca2+ release by caffeine and voltage in frog skeletal muscle.

N Shirokova, E Ríos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Voltage modulates halothane-triggered CaThe Journal of general physiology · 2018
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Calcium release in skeletal muscle: from K+ contractures to Ca2+ sparks.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2001
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N ShirokovaDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush University, School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. N.Shirokova: nshiroko@rpslme.edu
E Ríos
Rush University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Using a fast flow, computer-controlled, two-Vaseline-gap chamber, single muscle fibres were subjected to 'pulses' of caffeine at Ca2+ releasing concentrations, combined with voltage-clamp depolarizations, while monitoring intracellular [Ca2+]. 2. Ca2+ release flux elicited by caffeine reached 2.5 mM s-1, or less, after 3 s of exposure, then decayed to zero. The caffeine-releasable pool of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ was 2.9 +/- 0.4 mM (mean +/- S.E.M., n = 10). 3. In parallel with release induced by caffeine, release induced by voltage pulses applied during a caffeine exposure increased in the first second of exposure, then decreased, to abolition after 5 s. 4. The amount of Ca2+ releasable by depolarizing pulses was always equal to the amount of Ca2+ in the caffeine-releasable pool. Therefore, there is a single releasable Ca2+ pool. This pool is well stirred-it takes much more time to lose its Ca2+ by release than to diffusionally homogenize its [Ca2+]. Its depletion explains quantitatively the decay of release induced by caffeine or voltage during an exposure to caffeine. 5. A 1.5 s pulse to 10 mV, applied during exposure to caffeine, resulted in large Ca2+ release and, upon repolarization, termination of the caffeine-induced release. This is similar to repolarization-induced stop of caffeine contracture (RISC) in embryonic murine myoballs. The permeability elicited by caffeine (ratio of flux to calcium in the releasable pool) was not affected by depolarizing pulses. Therefore, the mechanism of the RISC-like effect was Ca2+ depletion. 6. Caffeine-induced release did not depend on the holding potential. 7. Whether caffeine was present or not, release activated by voltage remained always under voltage control, ending rapidly upon repolarization. A depolarizing pulse induced a release permeability with an early peak, followed by decay to a steady level. Caffeine (10 mM) shifted the mid-activation voltage of both peak and steady components by -15 mV and increased the steepness of their voltage dependence by 15%. The maximum permeability increased by 30% for the peak and 25% for the steady component (n = 5). These results neither support nor disprove the hypothesis that the peak of Ca2+ release is activated by Ca2+. 8. The similar potentiation by caffeine of both components of release, the continued ability of voltage to control release in the presence of caffeine, and its failure to alter caffeine-induced permeability indicate that caffeine and the voltage sensor enhance independently the channel's tendency to open.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaffeineCalciumCalcium ChannelsCentral Nervous System StimulantsElectrophysiologyIn Vitro TechniquesMembrane PotentialsMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalPatch-Clamp TechniquesPerfusionRana pipiensSarcoplasmic ReticulumCaffeineCalciumCalcium ChannelsCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID8782099
PMCPMC1158920
OpenAlexW2049314125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.