Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8781872›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1996

Energy consumption of paraplegic locomotion using reciprocating gait orthosis.

J Beillot, F Carré, G Le Claire, P Thoumie, B Perruoin-Verbe, A Cormerais, A Courtillon, E Tanguy, G Nadeau, P Rochcongar and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Functional walking ability of paraplegic patients: comparison of functional electrical stimulation versus mechanical orthoses.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2013
    Review
  4. Preliminary evaluation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2011
    Article
  5. Control and implementation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2011
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J BeillotUnité de Biologie et Médecine du sport. Hópital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
F Carré
G Le Claire
P Thoumie
B Perruoin-Verbe
A Cormerais
A Courtillon
E Tanguy
G Nadeau
P Rochcongar
J Dassonville
Hôpital Pontchaillou · FRHôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard · FRHôpital Saint-Jacques · FRLaboratoire sur le Langage, le Cerveau et la Cognition · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The energy cost of walking using a reciprocating gait orthosis (RGOII) with functional electrical stimulation (FES) was assessed in 14 patients with spastic complete paraplegia from six rehabilitation centres. Before and after training asing RGOII with FES, the subjects performed a progressive maximal test on an arm-crank ergometer to obtain their laboratory peak oxygen uptake (LVO2peak), heart rate (HR) and blood lactate concentration changes. At the end of the training session, oxygen uptake (VO2) was measured during a walking test with orthosis at different speeds (6 min steady state at 0.1 m.s-1, followed by 2-min stages at progressively increasing speeds up to exhaustion). Of the subjects 4 repeated this test using orthosis without FES. At a speed of 0.1 m.s-1, VO2 represented 47 (SD 23)% of LVO2peak, mean HR was 137 (SD 21) beats.min-1 and mean blood lactate concentration 2.4. (SD 1.4) mmol.l-1. Maximal speed ranged from 0.23 to 0.5 m.s-1. At maximal speed, VO2 was 91 (SD 18)% of LVO2peak, mean HR reached 96 (SD 7)% and mean blood lactate concentration only 52 (SD 19)% of the maximal values measured during the laboratory test. Walking without electrical stimulation induced an increase in HR but there was no difference in VO2 and blood lactate compared to walking with stimulation. The training period did not result in any improvement in maximal physiological data. We concluded that the free cadence walking speed with orthosis remains much lower than that of able-bodied people or wheelchair users. The metabolic cost at a given speed is much higher even if, using a stimulation device, the cardiovascular stress is reduced.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismOrthotic DevicesAdultElectric StimulationGaitHeart RateHumansLactic AcidLocomotionOxygen ConsumptionParaplegiaLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID8781872
OpenAlexW2004002155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.