Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8781381›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives1996

Role of transcription-coupled DNA repair in susceptibility to environmental carcinogenesis.

P C Hanawalt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing chemical risk assessment decision-making with population variability data: challenges and opportunities.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Article
  2. DNA damage during the G0/G1 phase triggers RNA-templated, Cockayne syndrome B-dependent homologous recombination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DNA damage, DNA repair, cell proliferation, and DNA replication: how do gene mutations result?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P C HanawaltDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, California 94305-5020, USA. hanawalt@leland.stanford.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Susceptibility to environmental carcinogenesis is the consequence of a complex interplay between intrinsic hereditary factors and actual exposures to potential carcinogenic agents. We must learn the nature of these interactions as well as the genetic defects that confer enhanced risk. In some genetic diseases an increased cancer risk correlates with a defect in the repair or replications of damaged DNA. Examples include xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), ataxia telangiectasia, Fanconi's anemia, and Bloom's syndrome. In Cockayne's syndrome the Specific defect in transcription-coupled repair (TCR) does not predispose the patients to the sunlight-induced skin cancer characteristic of XP. The demonstration of TCR in the XP129 partial revertant of XP-A cells indicates that ultraviolet (UV) resistance correlates with repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in active genes. Repair measured as an average over the genome can be misleading, and it is necessary to consider genomic locations of DNA damage and repair for a meaningful assessment of the biological importance of particular DNA lesions. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are found in many human tumors. TCR accounts for the resulting mutational spectra in the p53 gene in certain tumors. Li-Fraumeni syndrome fibroblasts expressing only mutant p53 are more UV-resistant and exhibit less UV-induced apoptosis than normal human cells or heterozygotes for mutations in only one allele of p53. The p53-defective cells are deficient in global excision repair capacity but have retained TCR. The loss of p53 function may lead to greater genomic instability by reducing the efficiency of global DNA repair while cellular resistance may be assured through the operation of TCR and the elimination of apoptosis.

Indexed as

DNA RepairTranscription, GeneticCarcinogens, EnvironmentalDNA DamageHumansNeoplasmsOncogenesPyrimidine DimersRisk AssessmentTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseTumor Suppressor Protein p53Carcinogens, EnvironmentalPyrimidine DimersTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID8781381
PMCPMC1469652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.