Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8781181›Full record

ReviewChromosoma1996

The license to pair: identification of meiotic pairing sites in Drosophila.

B D McKee

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Meiotic development in Caenorhabditis elegans.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2013
    Review
  8. Meiosis in male Drosophila.Spermatogenesis · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

B D McKeeDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. bdmckee@utk.edu
University of Tennessee Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sites for pairing and segregation of achiasmatic bivalents have been characterized in both male and female meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. The major sex chromosome pairing site in male meiosis corresponds to the intergenic spacer repeats of the rDNA arrays, which are located in the heterochromatin of the X and Y. The sex chromosome pairing sites in females are also heterochromatic, but involve different repeated sequences. In males, weak pairing sites are widely distributed along euchromatin but not heterochromatin of chromosome 2, an autosome. One strong site for male meiotic pairing has been identified on chromosome 2; it overlaps with the his locus, which contains the repetitive structural genes for the histones. In females the sites for pairing of chromosome 4, another autosome, are restricted to the heterochromatin. Thus for both sex chromosomes and autosomes, sites for achiasmatic pairing are heterochromatic in females but euchromatic (except for the rDNA) in males. The possible roles of sequence repetition and of transcription in chromosome pairing are discussed.

Indexed as

MeiosisAnimalsChromatinChromosome MappingDNA, RibosomalDrosophilaFemaleMaleX ChromosomeY ChromosomeChromatinDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID8781181
OpenAlexW2012615482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.