Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8779581›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology1996

Comparison of the bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate stress responses in Enterococcus faecalis.

S Flahaut, J Frere, P Boutibonnes, Y Auffray

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Stress-Responsive Periplasmic Chaperones in Bacteria.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Gut Microbiota and Pancreatobiliary System].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Inhibition ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Pathogenicity of Enterococci.Microbiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S FlahautLaboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement, Institut de Recherche en Biologie Appliquée, Université de Caen, France. lme@criuc.unicaen.fr
J Frere
P Boutibonnes
Y Auffray
Université de Caen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resistance to detergents and detergent-induced tolerance of a gastrointestinal organism, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433, were examined. The most remarkable observation was the rapid response of cells in contact with bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The killing by high concentrations of detergents was nearly instantaneous. A 5-s adaptation with moderate sublethal concentrations of bile salts or SDS (0.08 or 0.01%, respectively) was sufficient to induce significant adaptation against homologous lethal conditions (0.3% bile salts or 0.017% SDS). However, resistance to a subsequent lethal challenge progressively increased further to a maximum reached after 30 min of adaptation. Furthermore, extremely strong cross-resistances were observed with bile salts- and SDS-adapted cells. However, no relationship seems to exist between levels of tolerance and de novo-synthesized proteins, since blockage of protein synthesis during adaptation had no effect on induction of resistance to bile salts and SDS. We conclude that this induced tolerance to detergent stress is independent of protein synthesis. Nevertheless, the stress-induced protein patterns of E. faecalis ATCC 19433 showed significant modifications. The rates of synthesis of 45 and 34 proteins were enhanced after treatments with bile salts and SDS, respectively. In spite of the overlap of 12 polypeptides, the protein profiles induced by the two detergents were different, suggesting that these detergents trigger different responses in E. faecalis. Therefore, bile salts cannot be substituted for SDS in biochemical detergent shock experiments with bacteria.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBile Acids and SaltsChloramphenicolDigestive SystemDrug ToleranceEnterococcus faecalisHumansKineticsProtein Synthesis InhibitorsSodium Dodecyl SulfateStress, PhysiologicalBacterial ProteinsBile Acids and SaltsChloramphenicolProtein Synthesis InhibitorsSodium Dodecyl Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID8779581
PMCPMC168024
OpenAlexW2100494738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.