ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics1996
Contribution of the polymerase chain reaction to the diagnosis of tuberculous infections in children.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Bioinformatics Whole-Genome Sequencing Workflow for Clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolate Analysis, Validated Using a Reference Collection Extensively Characterized with Conventional Methods andJournal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Strong increase of true and false positive mycobacterial cultures sent to the National Reference Centre in Belgium, 2007 to 2016.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019Observational
- Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Combined Species Identification and Drug Sensitivity Testing in Mycobacteria.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- New specimens and laboratory diagnostics for childhood pulmonary TB: progress and prospects.Paediatric respiratory reviews · 2011Review
- Newer diagnostic modalities for tuberculosis.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2004Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the contribution of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to the diagnosis of tuberculous infection in children. Two different PCR techniques were compared to the standard bacteriological methods for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 157 specimens obtained from the respiratory system of 51 children. Patients were classified in three groups: 12 patients with active disease (57 specimens), 12 patients with silent tuberculous infection (23 specimens) and 27 patients without tuberculosis (77 specimens). One PCR method (PCR/Ag85) used amplification of a fragment of the genes coding for the mycobacterial antigen 85 followed by hybridization of a probe specific for M. tuberculosis on the Southern blot of amplified DNA. The other PCR technique was a nested PCR (NPCR) using double amplification of a fragment of the insertion element IS6110 only present in the M. tuberculosis genome. The sensitivities of the different techniques, compared to the clinical diagnosis, were 7.0% for acid fast staining, 22.8% for culture, 24.6% for PCR/Ag85 and 44.9% for NPCR in active disease, 4.3% for culture, 8.7% for PCR/Ag85 and 28.6% for NPCR in silent tuberculous infection. The specificities were 100% for culture, 94.8% for PCR/Ag85 and 87.9% for NPCR. Among the 12 children clinically considered as having active tuberculosis, 1 had smear positive samples, 4 had at least one positive culture, 7 at least one positive PCR/Ag85 and 9 at least one NPCR positive sample. Among the 12 children having silent tuberculous infection, none had positive smears, 1 had one positive culture, 2 had at least one positive PCR/Ag85 and 5 at least one NPCR positive sample.
conclusionOur study suggests that both PCR techniques, and especially NPCR, are able to detect M. tuberculosis DNA in specimens containing few micro-organisms. PCR methods are more sensitive than culture and the results are available more quickly. Testing multiple samples from the same individual increased the sensitivity. In view of occasional false-positive results, cultures remain the gold standard to establish definitive diagnosis of primary tuberculous infection in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.