Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8775224›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics1996

Contribution of the polymerase chain reaction to the diagnosis of tuberculous infections in children.

M Fauville-Dufaux, A Waelbroeck, P De Mol, B Vanfleteren, J Levy, P Debusschere, C M Farber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Strong increase of true and false positive mycobacterial cultures sent to the National Reference Centre in Belgium, 2007 to 2016.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Newer diagnostic modalities for tuberculosis.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2004
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M Fauville-DufauxLaboratory of Tuberculosis and Mycobacteria, Institut Pasteur-Bruxelles, Brus
A Waelbroeck
P De Mol
B Vanfleteren
J Levy
P Debusschere
C M Farber
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BEErasmus Hospital · BEInstitut Pasteur · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the contribution of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to the diagnosis of tuberculous infection in children. Two different PCR techniques were compared to the standard bacteriological methods for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 157 specimens obtained from the respiratory system of 51 children. Patients were classified in three groups: 12 patients with active disease (57 specimens), 12 patients with silent tuberculous infection (23 specimens) and 27 patients without tuberculosis (77 specimens). One PCR method (PCR/Ag85) used amplification of a fragment of the genes coding for the mycobacterial antigen 85 followed by hybridization of a probe specific for M. tuberculosis on the Southern blot of amplified DNA. The other PCR technique was a nested PCR (NPCR) using double amplification of a fragment of the insertion element IS6110 only present in the M. tuberculosis genome. The sensitivities of the different techniques, compared to the clinical diagnosis, were 7.0% for acid fast staining, 22.8% for culture, 24.6% for PCR/Ag85 and 44.9% for NPCR in active disease, 4.3% for culture, 8.7% for PCR/Ag85 and 28.6% for NPCR in silent tuberculous infection. The specificities were 100% for culture, 94.8% for PCR/Ag85 and 87.9% for NPCR. Among the 12 children clinically considered as having active tuberculosis, 1 had smear positive samples, 4 had at least one positive culture, 7 at least one positive PCR/Ag85 and 9 at least one NPCR positive sample. Among the 12 children having silent tuberculous infection, none had positive smears, 1 had one positive culture, 2 had at least one positive PCR/Ag85 and 5 at least one NPCR positive sample.

conclusionOur study suggests that both PCR techniques, and especially NPCR, are able to detect M. tuberculosis DNA in specimens containing few micro-organisms. PCR methods are more sensitive than culture and the results are available more quickly. Testing multiple samples from the same individual increased the sensitivity. In view of occasional false-positive results, cultures remain the gold standard to establish definitive diagnosis of primary tuberculous infection in children.

Indexed as

AdolescentBase SequenceChildChild, PreschoolFalse Positive ReactionsHumansInfantMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID8775224
OpenAlexW2081331201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.