Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8767210›Full record

ArticleSozial- und Praventivmedizin1996

Smoking habits of future physicians: a survey among medical students of a south German university.

H Brenner, S Scharrer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sozial- und Praventivmedizin, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Smoking Prevalence among Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H BrennerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Ulm.
S Scharrer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians can play a key role in promoting abstinence from tobacco. In many European countries, however, a large proportion of physicians are still smoking themselves. To assess smoking habits of future physicians, a cross-sectional study was conducted in 1992/1993 among 817 students enrolled in the first, third, and fifth years of medical school at the university of Ulm, Germany, using a self-administered questionnaire. The overall participation rate was 85.2%. Prevalence of current smoking was 17.6% among female participants and 29.2% among male participants. Among male students, smoking prevalence varied between 22.9% in the first year and 34.6% in the fifth year of medical school. Among female students, there were only minor differences in smoking prevalence between the first, third and fifth years at medical school. Most of the smokers had started to smoke prior to entry into medical school. Among third and fifth year students, slightly more students quit smoking than started to smoke during medical school, and smokers in the fifth year of medical school were more frequently willing to quit than smokers in the first and third year. Factors associated with regular smoking of medical students, after adjustment for potential confounders in multivariable analysis, were age, sex, and maternal smoking. While smoking prevalence was somewhat lower in the present study than in previous studies from Germany, further efforts are needed to reduce smoking among future physicians in this country.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalAdultConfidence IntervalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPrevalenceSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID8767210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.