Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8765681›Full record

ArticleGenetica1996

Repeated horizontal transfer of P transposons between Scaptomyza pallida and Drosophila bifasciata.

S Hagemann, E Haring, W Pinsker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Drosophila P transposons of the urochordata Ciona intestinalis.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2009
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evidence for the recent horizontal transfer of long terminal repeat retrotransposon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1999
    Article
  11. A phylogenetic perspective on P transposable element evolution in Drosophila.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S HagemannInstitut für Allgemeine Biologie, AG Genetik, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Wien, Austria.
E Haring
W Pinsker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two distinct P element subfamilies, designated M-type and O-type, reside in the genome of D. bifasciata. PCR-screening of 65 Drosophila species revealed that only D. bifasciata and its closest relative D. imaii possess O-type elements. Outside the genus, O-type elements were detected in Scaptomyza pallida. Restriction analyses show that the general structure of the O-type elements from S. pallida and D. bifasciata is the same. Sequence divergence turned out to be extremely low (0.43%). These results suggest that the O-type subfamily of D. bifasciata has been received by horizontal transfer from an external source, most probably from the genus Scaptomyza, as has been previously suspected for the M-type family. Since the sequence divergence between M-type elements from S. pallida and D. bifasciata is eighteen-fold higher than that between O-type elements, two independent intergeneric transfer events have to be postulated. In order to re-examine the taxonomic status of S. pallida, a partial sequence (489 bp) of the Adh gene was analysed. The data clearly prove that S. pallida has to be placed far outside the D. obscura group.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAlcohol DehydrogenaseAnimalsBase SequenceDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilaDrosophilidaeGenes, InsectGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataRestriction MappingSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityAlcohol DehydrogenaseDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID8765681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.