Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8763864›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of cancer. Supplement1996

The molecular response of mammalian cells to hypoxia and the potential for exploitation in cancer therapy.

G U Dachs, I J Stratford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of cancer. Supplement, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G U DachsMedical Research Council, Harwell, Didcot, UK.
I J Stratford

Funding

Medical Research Council G0500366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, reports of the increased expression of selected genes in response to hypoxia have been summarised. The best studied mammalian hypoxia response systems are those of the erythropoietin (Epo) and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes, which will be described in some detail. Other genes discussed here include those encoding growth factors, cytokines, transcription factors, metabolic enzymes and DNA repair enzymes. Short DNA sequences (hypoxia response elements) governing the increased gene expression in response to hypoxia have been discovered in the vicinity of most of these genes. The review will end by analysing the possibility of exploiting tumour hypoxia via the use of hypoxia response elements for gene therapy of cancer.

Indexed as

Cell HypoxiaGenetic TherapyAnimalsCytokinesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairEndothelial Growth FactorsErythropoietinHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitLymphokinesNeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ACytokinesDNA-Binding ProteinsEndothelial Growth FactorsErythropoietinHIF1A protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitLymphokinesNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID8763864
PMCPMC2150030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.