ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
Inhibition of purinergic transmission by prostaglandin E1 and E2 in the guinea-pig vas deferens: an electrophysiological study.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The effects of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and E2 (PGE2) on postjunctional electrical activity in the guinea-pig vas deferens evoked by sympathetic nerve stimulation were investigated using both intracellular and focal extracellular recording techniques in vitro. 2. Bath application of PGE1 (1-100 nM) or PGE2 (0.1-100 nM) concentration-dependently inhibited the amplitudes of all excitatory junction potentials (e.j.ps) evoked during short trains of stimuli (10 stimuli at 1 Hz). Increasing the duration of nerve stimulation (100 stimuli at 1 Hz) did not overcome this inhibitory effect. At these concentrations PGE1 and PGE2 were without any apparent inhibitory effect on the amplitudes of spontaneous e.j.ps. 3. Local application of PGE1 (10-100 nM) or PGE2 (10-30 nM) markedly reduced the frequency of occurrence of excitatory junction currents (e.j.cs) evoked by trains of 20-100 stimuli at 1 to 4 Hz without changing the amplitudes of spontaneous e.j.cs or the configuration of the nerve terminal impulse. 4. In the presence of PGE1 or PGE2, raising the frequency of stimulation (from 1 to 4 Hz), increased the likelihood of e.j.c. occurrence. 5. The postjunctional electrical activity recorded in the guinea-pig vas deferens is believed to be due to ATP released from the sympathetic nerve endings. Thus the present study demonstrates that both PGE1 and PGE2 powerfully inhibit quantal ATP release in the guinea-pig vas deferens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.