Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8760868›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1996

Recruitment of damaged DNA to the nuclear matrix in hamster cells following ultraviolet irradiation.

D R Koehler, P C Hanawalt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Nuclear Organization in Response to Stress: A Special Focus on Nucleoli.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. DNA interstrand crosslink repair in mammalian cells: step by step.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Translocation of Cockayne syndrome group A protein to the nuclear matrix: possible relevance to transcription-coupled DNA repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D R KoehlerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, CA 94305-5020, USA.
P C Hanawalt
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the relationship between the nuclear matrix and DNA in the dihydrofolate reductase domain following irradiation of Chinese hamster cells with UV light. The fraction of matrix-bound DNA increased in transcribed and non-transcribed regions during a 3 h period after irradiation. However, no increase was observed with excision repair-deficient cells mutant for the ERCC1 gene. The major UV-induced lesion, the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer, increased in frequency in the matrix-bound DNA 1 h after irradiation, in both transcribed and non-transcribed regions, but decreased subsequently. This phenomenon was also lacking in excision repair-deficient cells. These data demonstrate that recruitment of lesion-containing DNA to the nuclear matrix occurs following UV irradiation and suggest that this recruitment is dependent upon nucleotide excision repair. This is consistent with the concept of a 'repair factory' residing on the nuclear matrix at which excision repair occurs.

Indexed as

Cell CompartmentationDNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeNuclear MatrixSubcellular FractionsTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseUltraviolet RaysTetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID8760868
PMCPMC146037
OpenAlexW2112894423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.