Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8760745›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

Use of oral corticosteroids in the community and the prevention of secondary osteoporosis: a cross sectional study.

L J Walsh, C A Wong, M Pringle, A E Tattersfield

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 385 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Systematic review of trends in prophylaxis of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: the need for standard audit guidelines.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2008
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Intermittent intravenous ibandronate injections reduce vertebral fracture risk in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: results from a long-term comparative study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2003
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Update on the Complications and Management of Liver Cirrhosis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L J WalshDivision of Respiratory Medicine, City Hospital, Nottingham.
C A Wong
M Pringle
A E Tattersfield
Nottingham City Hospital · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the prevalence of continuous use of oral steroids in the general population, the conditions for which they are prescribed, and the extent to which patients taking oral steroids are taking treatment to prevent osteoporosis.

designA cross sectional study with a four year retrospective review of drug treatment.

settingEight large general practices in central and southern Nottinghamshire. SUBJECTS: A population of 65,786 patients (52% women) registered with a general practitioner during 1995.

results303 patients (65% (197) women) aged 12-94 years were currently taking "continuous" (for at least three months) oral corticosteroid treatment. This figure represents 0.5% of the total population and 1.4% (245/17 114) of patients aged 55 years or more (1.7% (166/9601) of women). The usual steroid was prednisolone (97% (294/303)), the mean dose was 8.0 mg/day, and the median duration of oral steroid treatment determined in 149 patients was three years. The most common conditions for which continuous oral steroids were prescribed were rheumatoid arthritis (23% (70)), polymyalgia rheumatica (22% (66)), and asthma or chronic obstructive airways disease (19% (59)). Only 41 (14%) of the 303 patients taking oral steroids had received treatment for the prevention of osteoporosis over the past four years. Although 37 of the 41 patients were women, only 10% (18/181) of the women over 45 years taking continuous oral corticosteroids were currently taking hormone replacement therapy.

conclusionsIf our figures are typical then they suggest that over 250,000 people in the United Kingdom are taking continuous oral steroids and that most of these are taking no prophylaxis against osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, RheumatoidAsthmaChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansLung Diseases, ObstructiveMaleMiddle AgedAdrenal Cortex HormonesPrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID8760745
PMCPMC2351752
OpenAlexW1965633872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.