ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1996
Outbreak of group A streptococci in a burn center: use of pheno- and genotypic procedures for strain tracking.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.American journal of infection control · 2007Guideline
- Outbreak of Streptococcus pyogenes emm type 58 in a high dependency unit of a level-1 trauma center of India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2014Article
- Presence of the tet(O) gene in erythromycin- and tetracycline-resistant strains of Streptococcus pyogenes and linkage with either the mef(A) or the erm(A) gene.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2003Article
- Phenotypes and genotypes of erythromycin-resistant pneumococci in Italy.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
- A novel efflux system in inducibly erythromycin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pyogenes.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a burn center, an outbreak of group A streptococci (GAS) colonizations involving 13 patients and two staff members occurred. Adverse events due to GAS, loss of skin graft after initial take (secondary loss) and partial take, occurred in patients who underwent surgery before the colonization was detected. GAS isolates from nine patients and one staff member were stored and subsequently pheno- and genotyped by T serotyping, gas chromatography, M genotyping, and random amplified polymorphic DNA typing. The outbreak was caused by two types of GAS, identified as T4/28-M48 and T13-M77 by T serotyping and M genotyping. Random amplified polymorphic DNA typing and gas chromatography distinguished both clusters accurately. One subcluster indicated by gas chromatography could be linked to the acquisition of GAS from a roommate. The T13-M77 cluster was characterized by rapid spread through the center compared with the T4/28-M48 cluster. One patient contracted the T13-M77 strain while in protective isolation, indicating a role for staff members in the transmission. Our standard GAS control policy, consisting of twice weekly screening of all burned patients and immediate isolation and treatment, proved efficacious in preventing further spread of GAS. Reporting by staff members of signs and symptoms compatible with GAS infection was reenforced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.