Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8748271›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical microbiology1996

Simultaneous PCR detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 from genital ulcers.

K A Orle, C A Gates, D H Martin, B A Body, J B Weiss

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 319 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chancroid.Sexually transmitted infections · 2006
    Guideline
  3. Syphilis.Sexually transmitted infections · 2006
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Proportion ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on syphilis diagnostics.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  15. Infections caused byClinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. CDC Laboratory Recommendations for Syphilis Testing, United States, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. LAMP4yaws:BMJ open · 2022
    Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K A OrleRoche Molecular Systems, Alameda, California 94501, USA. karina.orle@roche.com
C A Gates
D H Martin
B A Body
J B Weiss
Roche (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multiplex PCR (M-PCR) assay with colorimetric detection was devised for the simultaneous amplification of DNA targets from Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2. By using target-specific oligonucleotides in a microwell format, 298 genital ulcer swab specimens collected in New Orleans during three intervals from 1992 through 1994 were evaluated. The results of the M-PCR assay were compared with the results of dark-field microscopy and H. ducreyi culture on two different culture media. HSV culture results were available for 99 specimens collected during the third interval. Confirmatory PCR assays targeting different gene sequences for each of the three organisms were used to validate the M-PCR results. Specimens were resolved as positive for the determination of sensitivity if the reference diagnostic test was positive or if the results of both the M-PCR and the confirmatory PCR were positive. The resolved sensitivities of M-PCR for HSV, H. ducreyi, and T. pallidum were 100, 98.4, and 91%, respectively. The resolved sensitivities of HSV culture, H. ducreyi culture, and dark-field microscopy were 71.8, 74.2, and 81%, respectively. These results indicate that the M-PCR assay is more sensitive than standard diagnostic tests for the detection of HSV, H. ducreyi, and T. pallidum from genital ulcers.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBase SequenceChancroidColorimetryDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA ProbesDNA, ViralGenital Diseases, MaleHaemophilus ducreyiHerpes GenitalisHerpesvirus 1, HumanHerpesvirus 2, HumanHumansMaleMolecular Sequence DataDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA ProbesDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID8748271
PMCPMC228728
OpenAlexW2165862558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.